|
|
 |
|
Hebrew 13:4 "but fornicators and adulterers God will judge."
Prophecy says that the church will be lead to myths. Therefore we can be certain that the church will someday study how
the NT tells a myth story. However, there is no prophecy that says that who ever leads the church to that study that a
superb job will be done at the same time. It will be clear from reading this site that only a sufficient background
with a reasonable explanation is all that will ever be found that enables the church to be lead. Later, after the
church sees the connection, then the scholars may come in. I feel it is good for the reader to know before hand that what
they will find here is what may be read in a children's section of the library.
Proving that Paul was reborn recently will be proven further below. First some background on how Paul's rebirth
fits into the Greek myth story of the Iliad, and the Odyssey.
This link explains, and also fulfills prophecy found in the Christian myth story of Paul's "my gospel,"( Romans
2:16; 16:25, 2 Timothy 2:8) that parallels the Greek myth story of the Odyssey. Timothy is told by Paul to complete
his ministry: 2 Timothy 4:4 - 5 " and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside
to fables. But you be watchful in all things, endure afflictions, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill your ministry."
In the Greek myth story of The Odyssey, the young, but maturing boy, now reaching manhood, called Telemachus, goes
in search of his father, Odysseus, who has been away from home nearly the entire lifetime of Telemachus. When Telemachus
returns to his home land after not finding his father, he soon learns that his dad has returned home, disguised as a
poor beggar.
In the book called "The Rosicrucian Cosmo Conception" written by the reborn apostle Paul, that we will investigate
below, we will find that Paul hides under a similar garmet of deception.
In the Greek Odyssey it appears that all of the travels of Odysseus, and Telemachus happen within one life time,
but there is symbolism that hides a deeper meaning. When understood the symbolism shows that the Odyssey covers
two life times, or about the time span of 2000 years. That symbolism is covered at the bottom of Home page, in the link
more home page. If those ideas were not read already, go in faith for now that about two thousand years are covered in
the Odyssey; so that when related to the "my gospel" of Paul we are brought up to modern times today.
Read that explanation later when you have time.
Peter and Paul were together during the time soon after Jesus Christ ascended to heaven. By analogy when
Peter later met Paul soon after Jesus departed, that would be like Odysseus, who fathered a child called Telemachus. In
the NT the person called Paul, like Jesus, and the father of Jesus are called master craftsmen, or carpenters (Matthew
13:55; Mark 6:3, 1 Corinthians 3:10) but Peter receives no such honor in the NT. Therefore we may say that Peter
is like a child by comparison. At the end of the NT Paul, and Peter die. They do not find one another again until two
life times later, and even then the reborn Peter only learns of the teachings Paul left behind, found in the works
of the Rosicrucian Fellowship, where it is taught, one among many things, that those who succeed are called master craftsmen.
The Christian myth story in the "my gospel" of Paul, the character Timothy, who Paul calls "my son," will become 2000
years later, the reborn, and some what evolved apostle Peter. In the story of the Odyssey, Telemachus is sent off by
Athena who is disguised as Mentor, to look for his father. In the my gospel of Paul, Timothy would serve to be like the character
of Mentor. The guidance found within the letter of Timothy would help the reborn apostle Peter to fulfill his ministry,
where he would help his dad to defeat the traitors.
Here follows, hopefully, a better explanation on the above idea of my gospel and Telemachus.
Myth stories typically have an elevated meaning.
Athena, who is an angel, appeared in the form of a man, Mentor. Athena appeared as the man, Mentor, only
after Telemachus had already matured. The actual Mentor was the wise man that guided Telemachus so he grew into
a man. Telemachus would easily accept as good council what ever Mentor began. Of course Telemachus would be fooled
by Athena, but that did not matter for Athena knew more than did Mentor. Athena then lead Telemachus to search for his
father, Odysseus, so that together they could defeat those who were attempting to destroy the household of Odysseus.
Athena embodies the higher wisdom that angels are in touch with. Athena is the same as the Holy Spirit.
Athena is under the command of Zeus, the chief God in Olympus. Zeus knew there were other Gods too, those higher
than himself, for his father, and mother were the Titans: Father, Chronos, and Mother, Rhea. The archangel Michael
would be like Zeus. Chronos, and Rhea would be manifestations of what is called God, the Father, by Christians.
The Koran, or Qur’an for Muslims does not involve its self with myth stories. The God in Islam is God
over the Titans, or is higher than God the Father of Christianity. But then that is due to the gospels being in the
form of an allegory.
The deeper mysteries of Christianity show they also know of the true nature of the God of Islam, and of the God
in the gospels. After all, that is what is being taught here and now by one who is a bit in the know.
I always go off on a tangent, and here goes again. Muslims may worship the true God of all, but if they don’t
have a clue on the different levels of creation, and they abuse, and dishonor the lower creations of God, then they have dishonored
Allah, the Lord of all worlds in the process. If Muslims can’t honor the other worlds, then how much more disrespect
will they show if they were to meet God the creator of all. That ends the tangent.
In reality as already noted above, Mentor was not involved in the beginning of the task to find help to defeat the traitors.
Athena was the guide from the beginning to the end. So for our warfare in my gospel to defeat the traitors we must look
for something beyond the surface teaching of the NT. 2 Corinthians 10:4 - 7: "For the weapons
of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high
thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, bringing every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ,
and being ready to punish all disobedience when your obedience is fulfilled. Do you look at things according to the
outward appearance?”
Next we look at the similarities of The Odyssey with the my gospel of Paul.
Paul is guided by the Holy Spirit to write down the letters of 1st and 2nd Timothy. Of course all of the 14 letters
by Paul are assisted by the Holy Spirit, but concerning revealing the my gospel and how it works with Telemachus
in the Odyssey, we confine ourselves to 1 and 2 Timothy where in 2 Timothy my gospel appears for the third, and final
time.
In this case of my gospel, the Holy Spirit takes on the guise of Timothy. That is like Athena becomes
Mentor. Then Paul makes it look like in 2 Timothy that this is his son. (The idea on Paul's son
will be covered in more detail later a little further below. It might be a good idea to come back here after
reading that idea, and see if then this explanation here makes more sense at that time. ) The guidance in 2 Timothy
talks about his son fulfilling the works that Paul commanded him, works inspired by the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit as found
in 2 Timothy commands the son of Paul to lead the church to myths. Since myths have an elevated meaning, then
the son Paul is actually talking about is not Timothy, but his spiritual son the apostle Peter.
We should see that like Athena was involved in the beginning of the exploits of Telemachus to search for his father,
and protect his home, so is there a similar pattern in the Holy Spirit involved in the entire process of beginning the
exploits of Peter to search for Paul, so that the church is protected. This similarity only appears in its striking
finality in the letter of 2 Timothy where myths are mentioned.
The above ends a quick insight into how the my gospel at 2 Timothy is to be interpreted. Now on to the earlier
time where my gospel appears, and where is told a destruction.
At Romans 2:16 we are told what will someday happen, where that day has finally come, and is today, or this century:
"in the day when God will judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ, according to my gospel."
The idea of weaving in and out of the my gospel with truth, and with lies, and other relevant ideas are covered
in the link "creating myths from guile," and at "Home" page. Sorry that these ideas are scattered all over this
website. Someday I hope to bring all together.
[ Note: March 4, 2010. I am a bit pleased that everything is running along fine in this ministry, maybe pleased
too much, so that I am not too concerned with this website like before. Sure it has some problems, but anything
a little hard to understand even if written perfectly, is still hard to understand. I suspect that if this website were
perfect, that many people would still be straining to understand some parts, particularly this one on the "My Gospel" of Paul,
and how it relates to the Greek myths. Thought I would mention what is going on now, where I am feeling maybe far too
relaxed, and have a "Ho Hum" attitude. ]
In the Odyssey, after Odysseus, and his son Telemachus reunite back home, there soon follows a dramatic battle where
father, and son destroy the traitors. The following idea will give a summary on how the destruction of the my
gospel of Paul comes about. The details will be explained later.
We have learned in Home page that the church of Jesus Christ is corrupted, and that the apostasy is here, and has
been so for about 1700 years.
In the scripture we are soon to look at, where to him is mentioned, we will find one more prophecy
of the destruction of the traitors foretold 2000 years ago, where once again a hint in these verses tells how it will be done.
Recall that in Home page we learned that the four gospels tell a myth story. Those four gospels include the preaching
of Jesus Christ. We may say that the preaching of Jesus Christ is what the four gospels are all about. Now in this
link it will be proven that Paul’s my gospel also tells a myth story. In order to understand who it is
that explains the my gospel of Paul we need to consider also the idea of: To Him.
In the letters of Paul every so often he mentions this phrase "To Him." Many times to him refers
to an every day human being, but at other times in the context of what Paul writes we would conclude that to him
means our creator, who is also called God. In between showing characteristics of a common person to the sublime
nature of God, the to him also tells of other states of consciousness that a human may experience that spans between
the other two extremes. These varying degrees of Christ consciousness found in the New Testament reflect upon different
states of awareness described by Eastern religions as a person in meditation grows into Cosmic Consciousness. After
all both are still human beings no matter if from the east, or from the west.
Christians believe God, and Christ are the same in practically everything possible only that there appeared
on earth in the form of man a divine being called Jesus Christ, who Christians say is God's son. That can be
confusing because after all it is actually part of a myth story. Just look at the church doctrines
and one will see how confused they are. Simply accept it is a myth story and the confusion is gone. The
religion of Christianity is a type of yoga that for the most part predominates with what in the east is called Karma
Yoga. Christianity also contains the other three yogas within it to a lesser degree, where all of
that path is veiled under the guise of a myth story. Jesus Christ in the eastern religions is considered a
Master in his particular kind of Yoga.
Here is an example on the to Him, that is confusing unless we know a myth story is at the bases of it
all: Ephesians 3:19 - 21 "to know the love of Christ which passes knowledge; that you may be
filled with all the fullness of God. Now to Him who is able to do exceedingly abundantly above all that we ask or think, according
to the power that works in us, to Him be glory in the church by Christ Jesus throughout all ages, world without end.
Amen. " Here is another: Ephesians 4:15 " but, speaking the truth in love, may grow up in all things
into Him who is the head Christ "
It then should not seem too strange to believe that the "To Him" in the verses we will soon read is the
reborn apostle Peter. God speaks through a human intermediary. If we can grow up into all things then we enter into
Him who is the head Christ. ( No, I am not a Master, like Jesus Christ. Christ has not filled me into all things.
I am still like a kid compared to that Master, but I am growing, and learning.)
That idea of the “To Him” will be covered in more detail later on in this link as well. A quick
explanation now on how "To Him" who is at times God could possibly include the reborn apostle Peter is found in
these verses from the OT: Haggai 2:23: "In that day,' says the Lord of hosts, `I will take you, Zerubbabel
( I was Zerubbabel before being reborn about 500 years later, and called Peter. I was reborn again around 900 AD, died
a few years later, and have been reborn today in 1948 AD. ) My servant, the son of Shealtiel,' says the
Lord, `and will make you as a signet ring; for I have chosen you,' says the Lord of hosts.''
A signet ring is used by a King to impress their royal sign on melted wax that was used to seal a letter, so
that the receiver may see, and know that what they have is authorized by the King. The scripture above is
an analogy of how God will use Zerubbabel. Since God can do miracles to carry out His design, then Zerubbabel when he
is reborn life after life, will be the one to show these are done by the King, God over all, and not done by some imposter
like the Devil.
About 500 years later Jesus chose Simon Bar Jonah, calling him Peter, where Petros means rock, and rock symbolizes the
letters of the prophets, and their prophecies to be fulfilled. Jesus used God's signet ring. Today God is working
miracles through Zerubbabel again, who is now called Dan in this life. Dozens of miracles line up with past prophecy
so that a sign is made that clearly tells us that here is the hand of God, and His signet ring is again Zerubbabel.
As we are learning, in Eastern teachings they say that a Master, or an advanced Yogi is also a vehicle by which God communicates
with humanity. A Master in the East can be a to Him in the west that is like Christ. In the
East sometimes they go so far as to say God is incarnate in a particular Master. Whatever qualities that master displays predominately
is then called a incarnate of a particular God in the Pantheon of Hinduism, or Buddhism , and so on. There are hundreds
of different gods in Hinduism, and Buddhism. In reality Hinduism is said to have over a million gods.
That makes sense because there are billions of humans on earth right now, so many of them would be worthy of some
degree of respect. Some Eastern Masters are below in rank of other Eastern Masters. We can begin to see that if
the various levels of human consciousness are called various Gods, where the Gods have different ranks among themselves,
then Greek myths, and the Eastern religions are near the same. Since Christianity is, as we are learning,
a myth then it fits in with other past religions too. The Christian church considers the apostles, and
other saints since the time of the early church fathers to be able to communicate with God. In the Catholic
Church, Greek, and Russian Orthodox, and a few other Christian churches it is believed that these saints are able
to extend favors if Christians will pray to them. Therefore Christianity has its own pantheon of Gods. Muslims
will pray to various saints, including Mohammed, even though in Islam it is taught that you should only worship God. Still
the Koran never says you can not ask for help from the friends of God for your daily needs.
When looking at Hinduism from a elevated understanding, in an abstract type of expansion of what the above all means
on the many gods, then we see that there is still only one God over all who is the creator for everything else, so that
Hinduism when seen in the proper light can be considered a monotheistic religion. That is a fantastic mind blowing
idea to consider, that Hinduism is monotheistic, that is if this is the first time a person has ever before considered
what the "To Him" may imply.
So we see that the To Him is important to understand because it turns out to be a human being who
explains the mysteries of God. A human explains the myth story of Paul that is found in his "my gospel."
The fact that my gospel is found in 2 Timothy, and also found again in verses quoted below, and found again just
before the myth story of my gospel begins that is similar to the Greek Odyssey leads us to understand these are key
areas that point to how to decipher what Paul will preach.
Note that the all important three times on my gospel, Romans 2:16,16:25;2 Timothy 2:8, is part of the
message. Before showing the verses, we need to know that to God one day to Him, 2 Peter 3:8, is as a thousand years
to man. So to God it has been only two days since Paul gave the verses below. Here now are the verses on a destruction,
when Satan is crushed, where is found my gospel:
Romans 16:17 - 25 "Now I urge you, brethren, note those who cause divisions and offenses, contrary to the doctrine
which you learned, and avoid them… And the God of peace will crush Satan under your feet shortly. The grace of our Lord
Jesus Christ be with you. Amen. Timothy, my fellow worker, and Lucius, Jason, and Sosipater, my kinsmen, greet you.
Now to Him who is able to establish you according to my gospel and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation
of the mystery which was kept secret since the world began."
When the verses are properly established for you that means that when Peter is reborn he will explain both the myth of
the four gospels, where that is the preaching of Jesus Christ, and the my gospel of Paul so that Satan may
be crushed under your feet, and the children of Satan are made a foot stool for Jesus Christ. That ends the summary
on the destruction.
Don't forget that the NT gives numerous different viewpoints on the destruction. They should all dovetail together
so a beautiful garment is woven that proves the reader is no longer mislead. Currently the apostasy has a
garment that is like the tale of "The Emperor's New Clothes" by Hans Christian Andersen. Anyone with some sense can
see the king, or in this instance the Pope, is walking about clothed like a mime; the clothes of one who plays a
clown. Sorry, I know that is rude. As said elsewhere, I believe that the Catholic church has been improving,
and is making great reforms recently.
In the letter of 2 Timothy, if we read only that letter, or laid our emphasis upon that letter alone to establish parenthood,
we would conclude that Timothy was the physical ancestral son of Paul. But if we read before that letter we find that
Timothy is called in 1 Timothy 1:2 “Timothy my true child in the faith.” In the letter just
before the letters of Timothy we find: 1 Thessalonians 3:2 “And sent Timothy, our brother, and minister
of God.” We would find in a letter before that called Philippians 2:22, Timothy is considered to be like a son.
So we know that Timothy is not a son born of the union of a physical mother and father, but instead is a spiritual son.
If we go back further we find that Paul, 1 Corinthians 4:17, calls timothy “who is my beloved and faithful son
in the Lord.” This shows a son who is spiritual son, not a physical son. Then if we go back further we find
the nature of Timothy and those like him: Romans 8:21 “because the creation itself also will be delivered from
the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.”
In all of the letters written by Paul, besides calling people like Timothy a son, the word Brethren is also used to show
they are children of God. Timothy is included as one of the brethren. But in the 2 letter of Timothy it appears that
Timothy is literally the son of Paul. Of course we know that means he is part of the brethren, but if the letter
of 2 Timothy were the only letter we had after the letter of Romans, then we would believe that Paul was the father
of Timothy. We recall that 2 Timothy 2:8 is the third, and last time Paul calls his preaching my gospel. All of
this means that we must analyze the entire works of Paul, and the other letters of the apostles, and the gospels together.
That way an honest evaluation can be make, and bias can be removed.
The pattern above on what constitutes a child of God proves to be the same idea where Jesus is called the son of God.
Jesus is not literally a son whose father is God, like Timothy is not a son whose father is Paul. The only difference
is that Jesus is above Paul in the spiritual Kingdom of God, and Paul is above Timothy. We should concluded then that
is evolution in the kingdom of God.
Since concerning the person called Jesus, most so called Christians only look at one portion of scripture, and then
they emphasize that like it appears in the letter of 2 Timothy telling the origins of Timothy, making him to be Paul’s
son, they confidently conclude that Jesus is the literal son of God. What is strange is that these Christians
will analyze everything almost like I have done here on Timothy, but when it comes to Jesus they throw all of their good methods
of investigation away. They base what they believe on Jesus on a letter of Paul called Colossians, where it says Jesus
is the image of God. If they would only look deeper they would see that Paul had told a lie. How Paul tells
us he is lying is covered in the link “creating myths from guile.” Sorry that link is still being worked
on. Hopefully the reader will simply read that link and ignore what they don’t enjoy, for eventually how
to investigate Paul’s lie will be found.
Investigating Paul’s lie is no more difficult than what was found above on Timothy. What makes it hard
for most “Christians” to make an unbiased investigation on all of Paul’s preaching is because they can’t
believe the first part of Paul’s preaching that calls those who believe his lie, that they are corrupt people.
Who wants to think they are corrupt? We all want to believe the best about ourselves, if possible.
Not only that, but most want to enjoy life to its fullest.
Therefore since they want to think what Paul says does not apply to them, Romans 1:28 - 32, they skip over what it says,
and then confidently believe the lie that is soon told, rather than reject it. At least one item in 28 - 32 will apply
to these people, and to some a lot more.
This proves that the spiritual kingdom is within each of us. If we go by outward appearances, and think we
are saved by a Jesus on the outside, a Jesus calling us to him from a heaven outside of ourselves, then we are deceived.
We only prove that what is within us makes ourselves rebellious children. Rebellious children want a way out so
they can rebel, and yet think they are good people. A Jesus calling them to a heaven that exists on the outside is what
will appeal to them.
Of course there are people who believe that the kingdom of God is within each of us, and yet they are worse than those
who believe the kingdom of God is external. SO we have both types in both kinds of outlooks. Hopefully, those who right
now believe that Jesus can not be found inside of you, if they follow properly the teachings of Paul anyway, follow
his lie, they are building up a spiritual house, to someday find Jesus calling from the inside. That is evolution too.
[ Here is topic that is relevant, but a little more out of order than some of the other ideas introduced in this
link: Excuse what appears rambling ideas here.
We looked a little earlier at how the my gospel was set up. Then it was told that many people could not believe
that they were the very ones that would follow a lie. However, they would follow the lie anyway since they could not
understand. If they followed Paul’s my gospel then they accepted the lie that a human called Jesus was really
God. The lie taught that Jesus was an aspect of God that appeared on earth, but still Jesus was equal to God.
This method of Paul can be seen as a preparation period, one may be called a probationer during this time, so later the
candidate may be initiated into a higher degree of consciousness. The higher degree would show the candidate that
Jesus was not God; Instead that Jesus was like a Yoga Master. But before that could happen the candidate had
to prepare themselves in various forms of purification, be tested in various trials, and in addition had to follow their proper
duty in life.
As said many times before in other links, it is that a person became a Christian, that is the important idea, where
they began their probationary status. It does not matter if the person fell for a lie, for after all it was the lie
that got them started on living a better life. In that there is no shame. Of course if a person became a Muslim, or
Buddhist, and so on, that is good too, what is important is that a straight path has been chosen that may lead to God.
In most eastern methods of Yoga, the candidate must first prepare themselves before learning a yoga technique.
Paul taught the same idea, but it was veiled so most never knew what he was doing. There is only one Yoga instructor
that I know of, but of course there must be others too, who lied to the candidate. That was Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. This
guy is like Paul turned inside out.
Maharishi gave an initiation to anyone. Then later the candidate had to learn on their own what was the probationary
method necessary to be initiated. If the person never learned the life of purity, trials, and duty necessary to
retain the initiation they first received, then the person fell from heaven into hell. After going into Hell, then generally
the candidate, if still alive, would begin the long hard process of learning what they should have done in the first place.
Maharishi’s method is the fast, but dangerous way. It is extreme meditation.
Going by my intuition, and not hearing the Holy Spirit object much at this added insight, we can see that by accepting
the process of reincarnation, if in the past a person had followed the teachings of Christ, the Karma Yoga path, they therefore
had already laid a good foundation as a probationer. Then even though in this life they had gone astray, that their
past hard work would support the initiation that Maharishi would give in this life. Modern western civilization teaches
a hidden agenda: a corrupt life style. It leads people astray. The initiation would awaken the past life
of good living, prior to modern times, so that the initiate would search to find out how to live the proper life again even
in a corrupt world. If Maharishi, like Paul, told the truth, then many who were initiated would not take that step to
be initiated, after they heard the many things in their life they would have to change.
Maharishi said that the person taking TM did not have to change their life style at all, and yet they could expect to
gain great benefit from the practice of TM.
So Maharishi told a great lie. Most every person after taking TM will begin to change their life style.
Those on drugs most likely will stop taking drugs, and some might even stop drinking alcohol, at the least they will not drink
as much. Then later they may change their diet, and on and on. The apostle Paul said that all food is blest
by God to eat, even allowing pork, but then Paul adds that not all may be beneficial for you. In that there is a very
subtle message by Paul that being a vegetarian is what is best. Eventually, after a few years of TM, some may
even refrain from sex. The apostle Peter says to keep the marriage bed undefiled, meaning not to be an adulterer, do not have
sexual misconduct. So for sex the choice is yours. Refrain completely, or in marriage respect each others needs,
and no sexual misconduct. But no matter what if you engage in sex you must first be married.
But in the modern west, if all of those same changes from ending drinking to change in diet, to changes in
sexual behavior were asked to be made before being initiated, then most audiences in western civilizations would laugh. They
would at the very least be amused. If the truth were told, once the word got around, the only reason anyone might attend
a introductory lecture thereafter, that spoke of the beneficial reasons for learning TM their attendance would be
simply to have a good laugh. The great rage of TM that for a time swept around the USA would never have begun if Maharishi
was totally honest.
We can then see that one Master, Jesus Christ, spoke of the purification necessary for initiation, told of the
hard path it would be to be an initiate, and also talked of the benefits of initiation. But all together that was a
very hard path. Later a disciple of Jesus, the apostle Paul then went to the gentiles and spread the good word that
Jesus spoke, but he told a lie, saying that by simply accepting Jesus that you made it into heaven immediately.
Then two thousand years later, another Master spoke of things like Jesus, who in the East was called Guru Dev, who sent
his disciple, Maharishi, out to initiate as many as possible.
The early years of Guru Dev are similar to some aspects of the life of Jesus, although the events happened in a different
land, in India. For example, about the time Jesus was 13 years old, in Israel, that was the time that typically
a male child had an arranged marriage, but Jesus never married, and instead left home. Home page explained
that Jesus traveled like a wandering monk, eventually coming to India. When Guru Dev was lead by his family
to do the same, an arranged marriage, he also refused to marry. He instead became a monk, and left his home, but
he was already in India. He did not have to wander so far as did Jesus. Guru Dev said, like did
Jesus, in his own way, that he would be about His father's business: that he would reign over a heavenly kingdom
for the blessings of all people on earth.
Jesus was welcomed entering Jerusalem one time by large crowds in a festive, and honorable manner, but he rode
on a donkey. That one time was similar to how Guru Dev was honored on many occasions in India, but humans carried
Guru Dev, instead of a donkey. Jesus was in Israel for only three years, and then believed to be executed.
So to keep up the pretense, he had to appear dead, and did not return. If Jesus had remained in his body longer,
to be seen, then his life among the Israelites would be near identical to Guru Dev where in festive processions Jesus
would be carried about by his disciples.
The Jews expected a redeemer, the return of Solomon, who most did not know was actually Jesus. The Hindu's
expected the return of Buddha, born around 500 BC, who later was born Sankara, around 788 AD, also known as sankaracarya,
also spelled Shankara, etc., who they eventually accepted to be Guru Dev, born circa 1890 AD. Anyone reading the
texts, and teachings of these three incarnations will see that he at times contradicts what was told earlier. This is like
Jesus, who was like the Greek god Hermes, who is a trickster.
Hermes once covered his trail, by first walking forward, then stepped backward in his previous footsteps, so
that by this trick he could steal the cattle of Apollo without being caught. The cattle would symbolize
humans. Hermes appeared then to have vanished into thin air from where his last foot step was found. Hermes also
did the same to the cattle. He took them forward, but since cattle can not walk backward very well, he removed
the hoofs off the cattle, and reattached them backward so they appeared to walk backward as they walked forward, and he then
lead them back. He then hid them in a cave. This way the cattle appeared to have also disappeared
into thin air. Then from the cave Hermes covered over his other tracks leaving the cave, and returned to his mother,
so it appeared he never left her.
Solomon, and Buddha life after life, in their various incarnations would play similar tricks on humans, one for the
west, the other for the east. That meant that the humans would think that God, or Apollo was one idea, then in
another life they would learn he was something else, so that the God the humans followed could not figure out who God really
was as Hermes, or Jesus, or Buddha had hid the cows in a cave. That cave that is in a rock symbolizes the
various teachings, mountains symbolize the teachings of the prophets, that they gave the other humans life after life.
The real God was to be found within each person, that is found to such a degree that God Conscious wisdom flows within the
person, so no external scripture could fool them any longer, but until that day came for each individual to realize
that fact, they would be fooled.
Apollo was identified with light, also the truth. Light symbolizes the spirit, and the spirit searches for his true
home. Therefore the spirit, each human, must learn truth. Apollo traveled across the sky in his fiery chariot that symbolized
the sun's travel from sunrise to sunset. This is the God that most of humanity sees as external, but it can also be found
within each one of us. Until at last we find Zeus, father of Apollo, or Christ consciousness within then those like Hermes
lead us on a wild chase of many deceptions life after life until we finally uncover the truth. We uncover the deeper truth
of Apollo, that the spirit within each one of us is identified with God, we are children of God, and then we are at last home.
Just because what is read here may make some sense, that does not mean that we have found home. No external explanations are
needed when that time comes.
Here is another attempt at how to interpret the myth story of Hermes, and Apollo. I have various spirits appear
before me, I am barely able to see them. They wish me to continue working on this idea, so here we go.
It is taught by all esoteric schools both East and West that God differentiates from that, that is His self an individual
spark of the divine, and sends it on a journey so that after trillions, and trillions of years of evolution that it can come
back again to having all the intelligence, and power that he had when it first was all part of that. At the time in
the beginning we could not say that we were separate, and at the same time be the same. At the beginning we only knew
we were part of God, without a unique identity. We could not say I am that, as we were simply that. There
was not an I or a uniqueness.
We might think this is very strange and do we really have to do this journey simply to gain uniqueness, and yet still
be the same? Well, as anyone can see, question it all you want, it won’t do any good.
So then we are left with having to complete the journey. We may ask how best do we get back, and accomplish what
we were sent out to do? We know at this point that God creates in what may be called allegorical terms, where
patterns are found that repeat from beginning to the end of our journey. We don’t need to spend time showing every
thing from beginning to end, covering a trillion years or more for once a pattern is found then we know only to repeat it.
The pattern is not identical age after age, but there are sufficient similarities so that a kind of similar pattern
can be found that we see repeats its self.
Fine, so then lets use the idea that Apollo is the outer sun, and is unique, and on its journey. The inner sun
its self is God, or Zeus. Zeus is not that, that was at the beginning. Zeus, or our God of the Bible
is on a journey too.
Again, for our purpose we look at one pattern, and in this case it is one of those more evolved than ourselves,
but they have not come back to the beginning. Since these four or five paragraphs are just being worked
on, 21 Nov. 2009, my explanation will be awkward; maybe hard to understand. Hopefully by 2010 sometime it will
make sense easily.
On earth we see the sun, the chariot of Apollo riding across the sky. In that we see that the outer spark of the
divine appears to have to work every day. We have for millions of years believed that we were the center of the universe,
and that the sun revolved around us on earth, but we learned recently, due to the evolution of the brain, that it was an illusion
due to the rotation of the earth on its axis. We are not the center. Instead we are traveling around on a journey about
the sun. We gain life experiences in the process. So a myth story was told that held a deeper meaning when understood.
Hermes fooled Apollo, but only for a short while, as those are more evolved beings than typical earthlings, but at the
same time this trick was used to show how the uniqueness of each person, who is symbolized by cattle will be lead around and
fooled too. Apollo was fooled for a few hours, but humans are fooled for thousands, if not millions of years by those
like Hermes. The typical human is like in a cave, with no light when it comes to figuring out the tricks of Hermes.
Hermes has to help the dumb humans out.
As we know, humans have a divine spark inside, not a bright light as the outer sun, but it is there even if it is hidden
in a cave. Gravity and momentum moved the earth around the sun, and in our case that little spark within ourself will
be moved about by the use of scripture. Someday a human will have a body that is like the earth, but that is some
very distant time away. Right now, if some humans were left to their own tendencies, they would not continue on
their journey to come back to God. So Hermes plays tricks to get them to do something, have them do almost anything
at all. Don’t just stand their like a dumb cow. We must evolve.
The explanation above on being tricked is but a brief summary of what involves having to read and also
have a reasonable grasp of the teachings of the Rosicrucian Fellowship (RF). There are a few other schools similar
to the RF. If the reader does not have an extensive background, then what is read above may seem beyond belief,
but with study the ideas told here will be found to be an accurate summary of God's plan for most of humanity. Most
of humanity are slow compared to the speedsters like Jesus, and Buddha. This is how us typical people who
are like cows by comparison are lead along by those who are like Olympic Gold Medalists in the field of evolution.
Few would want to live a life like Jesus, or like Guru Dev who dressed, and lived like Jesus. So Maharishi told
a lie in order to get around the life style of Jesus, and Guru Dev. Recently other eastern masters have journeyed west
to spread their methods of meditation. But only Maharishi, that I know of, is like Paul, in that both lied. Those
who have had the biggest impact in the world are those who lied: Paul, and Maharishi. These two were under the
command of those who were a To Him, whose disciples themselves became a To Him. Such actions as theirs are not
recommended to be attempted unless you are like them. If you are not like them, and you do as they did, you may
very well be going against God.
Recently, since last writing the above, I have learned that the Mormon Church is one other gathering following the
teachings of Jesus. They follow Jesus who we know is like the trickster Hermes. The teachings of
the Mormons are based upon a lie too, but since their teachings align with Jesus, and the lie of Paul, then it is sanctioned
under God as a legitimate teaching. They had their "To Him" those who began that church.
Very quickly: the way to prove their lie (even if the Holy Spirit is not helping the reader to verify
what they are learning here) is simply to use logic. The Book of Nephi at chapter 11 gives a simple to understand
explanation on the crucifixion of the redeemer, but they do not use the word Jesus, and that chapter even tells us that
this redeemer had 12 apostles. How tidy to have the most important ideas on Christianity to be written
down in one location. This is the kind of bait, Matthew 4:19, that makes one a very good fisher of men.
But by contrast the OT never clearly states that the redeemer will be crucified, or that he will have 12 apostles.
So we conclude that the Book of Mormon says what happened in hindsight in the light of the testimony of the NT.
That proves the book of Mormon was written after the NT, not 600 years before as the Book of Mormon is stated to have been
written. The Book of Mormon only has its self, that suddenly appeared out of thin air, to support when it
was written.
Jesus in a closed room also appeared out of thin air, but there were many witnesses who had for three years been
the disciples of Jesus before the miraculous appearance. The OT, and the NT are not like the Book of Mormon (BOM) that
tries to show parallels to the OT, and NT. The BOM gives easy bait so to catch many a fish. The BOM is not able
to prove it ever happened, rather it proves it never did. It is a fantastic lie. BUT, Paul told his lie, or his
"My Gospel" after the four gospels too.
The BOM is so tidy on its prophecy of the redeemer, of Jesus, that nothing like it can be found in the OT proving
that the BOM does not follow the previous Holy Books as far as the complexity, but it does follow what Paul told by his
obvious lie. Paul told us he lied, and in this day and age of science, beginning with the Industrial Revolution,
we may use research, along with logic to tell us when another is lying too.
Repeating my self to a mild degree, the OT is like the four gospels in that both tell many allegories, so
that, for example, what appears on the surface such as Jesus was crucified, turns out not to be true when the gospels are
investigated more closely, like would a scientist. So the OT and NT align in that they are complex, and difficult to
find the truth, and yet in both there is a simple level of understanding, and a deeper level for those who are wise.
But the BOM is like the lie of Paul. It says things that are easy to understand concerning Jesus, and the apostles. The
Mormons give a righteous path to God to follow that was done by telling a few lies.
The Holy Spirit told me many years ago that the Mormon Church, also called the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter
Day Saints, was a valid church, only I did not know why until recentlly when I studied all of the scriptures, including the
Qur'an. Before today, like a child I merely accepted what I heard from the Holy Spirit. Now by simple logic
we may confirm how the BOM lead a group of people that became one more of the followers of the trickster Jesus.
That ends that relevant note. ]
Back to myth stories in the NT. In order to understand this next idea, some background in Greek myths is needed.
Sorry no background is presented. Actually, before this link was read the reader should have a background, but that
can be done later on if one pleases. It might be good to have a separate window where this topic can be Google
searched, or what ever search engine you prefer, and the background filled in by that method. Try a search on children of
Hermes. Also wives of Hermes on the next idea that concerns Hermes and Penelope.
Consider that 1 Timothy is like when Hermes impregnated Penelope. This shows a spiritual connection where
a divine god weds a human. So Timothy is called by Paul “My true son in the faith”
Timothy is not called his son, so we might think it is his son in the flesh. This letter of 1 Timothy
shows characteristics of Telemachus who is growing at home, maturing to a man. Reading the letter of 1 Timothy
we find how is the household of Christ to be ordered, or in the case of Telemachus, the household of Odysseus to treat
those in the family.
Here now is another idea that might need to be Google searched. Again, you can simply read this link, and then sometime
later read the Greek myth stories. Here is a grievance, sorry it might be removed later: I already asked some people
who know myths to help, PhD in philosophy, people I have known for twenty five years, but all I get is "Thank you,
but not interested." If these people were an apostle, they would get beat up by Jesus for their refusal. Jesus
would put them in chains after that. That is what you get for following Jesus two thousand years ago. I suppose
other Yoga Masters do the same to some of their past disciples when those disciples are reborn, and forget who they followed
in a past life. Sorry to bring that up. That ends my grievance.
In 1 Timothy we learn the church is to be hospitable, use resources wisely, train others to good work. That
is like in the household of Odysseus. They were to be hospitable, and trained others, such as where Mentor raised
Telemachus to become mature to maintain the home. So 1 Timothy parallels the story of Telemachus growing
up to someday be able to protect his home, and continue the family name.
In 2 Timothy we find that the end times are spoken and Timothy must endure, and fight the good fight. That parallels
Telemachus going in search of his Father, where back at home the household is full of those who are treacherous, lovers of
pleasure and so on, who are those spoken about in 2 Timothy 3:1-6.
In 2 Timothy 2:8 we see my gospel. Here are some keys left behind so Timothy can open the doors to what Paul
preaches. 2 Timothy 2:8 “ Remember that Jesus Christ, of the seed of David, was raised from the dead according to my
gospel.” Within that sentence are the weapons of warfare used for this: 2 Corinthians 10:4 : "For the weapons
of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds."
Those weapons are the type taught by the reborn apostle Paul, found in his works at the Rosicrucian Fellowship.
From what he teaches we will see that we must investigate the Greek words, and they must be considered within the context
they are used, so to find that Jesus was not crucified. The link “Creating myths from guile“ will show how
it is done.
Timothy, as told before, is like Mentor of the Greek myth Odyssey. What Telemachus may grow up to be from
the tutoring of Mentor may not go as Odysseus planned. Also, Odysseus could not be sure that he would ever return home,
and so all that he could ultimately say through Mentor was his desire to see his son again. There was no absolute confidence
they would ever meet again, but a hope remained.
Paul was raised in culture, and given a proper education. Paul always said to be courteous in teaching, be patient
and so forth when serving as an apostle, or disciple of Jesus Christ. Paul could no more break out of his mold, and
behave like a commoner, than could a commoner instantly know the proper conduct of the priesthood, and high society.
Peter was raised among commoners, and given only an education in his particular trade. From that background he likely
had the ability to fight like a street fighter, could wield a sword with skill, and probably could hold his own in typical
fights.
When we look at the letters of Peter he calls those who fallback from the faith to be dogs, and swine. He calls
them to be like instinctual animals. He runs them down for quite a while, what seems like Jesus laying into the Pharisees,
and scribes, saying “Woe to you.” Among those who remain true he is sweet, and the epitome of kindness,
but for him to do as Paul would say in teaching others is not always his own style. So, repeating myself, when the reborn
Peter is placed into the role of the son of Paul, in his my gospel myth story, that takes place today, who follows
the instructions found in the letter of Timothy, where Timothy is like Mentor, then a different style will be shown by the
reborn Peter.
In the link “About me” you will find a person who was raised like an average US citizen, which
to me when I look at how I was raised, I compare that moral upbringing to being like raised in a barn by sheep, and horses.
Later, I went to college, and later still learned on my own proper conduct. We can not judge the son of man today, by
what the letter of Timothy explains on how to be a teacher. The end instructions of what the reborn Peter is to accomplish
will be done, but done in his own style like at times a commoner once again.
I have had many a minister think I am a fraud because rather than rebuke them kindly, and be like Paul tells a disciple
should be, I will instead level them to the ground. I show many verses to corroborate what I say, they then return
and mock me, then I like an axe cut them down with more verses that they never can reply to show I was wrong. They only
want me to act sweet in return, and since I am not that proves to them I am not an apostle of Jesus Christ.
So long as we look at the letter of 2 Timothy as being like Mentor, and then accepting that Athena disguised herself
at this time to look like Mentor, then when the reborn Peter comes, there is no reason not to suspect that just about anything
may have happened to him to have changed his personality. The myth stories of the Greek, and my gospel show
many parallels, but they are not exactly the same, nor will the charaters come to be the same. Only similarities
will be found. Also, something may have changed the characters more than imagined.
The Home page shows that I was arrested, and drugged. That ruined my mind to a degree, so that I can not
control myself like before. Under this present limitation I can not be like 2 Timothy asks of a disciple
no matter how hard I try. Isaiah 63 says that I will become an enemy, and so that has come to be true. Still, I will
fulfill leading the church to myth stories, and that is good enough for me.
The reader of my website, particularly at this point here, should read this in the tone of a person who is confident,
and feels good about what they are doing. There is not a feeling of anger, or revenge, or anything serious.
It is a sunny confidence that I feel. The reader should also consider that some of the letters Paul wrote, that Paul
may have forced himself not to break out laughing, even when confined to house arrest, as he wrote his message down.
He would suppress his laughter not because he had fooled his readers, but because he could see God’s plan come true
before his eyes in a vision, or how ever God revealed the end to him.
The point is that we do not know how to always read Paul’s letters. Paul is like Odysseus, a very clever,
and tricky man. You will see soon enough in the works of the reborn Paul just how tricky he can be.
Timothy is half Greek half Jew, born of a Greek father, and a Jewish mother. This one person incorporates the idea that
the Old Testament that is full of myth stories, allegories, and parables would be blended with the Greek myths into a
new myth version incorporating all that came before and would be found contained in the NT. In Paul's letters when
he uses warfare, he includes those persons who live in Achaia, and Macedonia that are portions of the Greek empire. That
idea parallels the travels of Odysseus gathering together the Greeks who would fight against Troy. Today a future
battle would be fought against Rome, where the defeated Trojans later built a new city they called Rome. That is why
the book of Romans bears that name. But what is Paul talking about when he speaks of warfare?
Here is where Paul speaks of warfare that comes immediately after he speaks of the ancient Greek world: 2
Corinthians 10:4-7 "For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting
down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, bringing every thought into captivity
to the obedience of Christ, and being ready to punish all disobedience when your obedience is fulfilled. Do you
look at things according to the outward appearance? "
Now that we are looking deeper, not judging by mere outward appearance, we see that myths are being told.
This lets us understand how "warfare" means revealing the knowledge of God so that it may cast down every high thing
that goes against God. Warfare is included at 1 Timothy 1:18 and 2 Timothy 2:4.
As we know the prophecy that Christianity will be lead to myths had never occurred before, but currently with
the rebirth of Peter, the feeding of the sheep (Isaiah 40:6-11, 1 Peter 1:23-25, John 21:15-18) to learn myths is
happening. In my life with Jesus, and 2000 years later in my life today both times this happened: John 21:18-19
"but when you are old, you will stretch out your hands, and another will gird you and carry you where you do not wish. This
He spoke, signifying by what death he would glorify God.'' Not long after that I died both times, except in this life
I was brought back to live again, Matthew 24:9, so to complete my ministry in the "my gospel" of Paul.
The reborn Peter will be guided along by God, and the agencies of God to complete more prophecy. So, in order
for the myth story of the Odyssey to be retold in an analogous version, but one more evolved, found in the Christian
myth of "my gospel" then the reborn Peter must learn in this life that the reborn Paul had already returned home to earth.
Peter will show how Paul concealed his identity, so that the prophecy found in "my gospel" may be complete. In addition
the information revealed here will also allow the Greek myth story of Pan, who died, and was transformed into
the new man called Peter, back 2000 years ago, to be completed. In the Greek myths Pan helped Zeus to win over
the other gods, and so Peter will help Jesus Christ to be victorious over the Devil in the Christian myth story. As
we should see, two myth stories are being explained, but this link is primarily for the Greek story of The Odyssey
that has transformed into the Christian myth of "my gospel."
Concerning the myth story of Pan, transformed into Peter, where in the gospels it tells of the church being built upon
a new man, who Jesus named Peter: There is prophecy in the gospels about a person called the coming of the son of man,
like in the days of Noah. This website fulfills prophecy not only that was foretold by Jesus in the gospels about the
coming of the son of man, but that also was told by Paul in his letters that are part of his “my gospel.”
In Paul's area of truth, that is still part of the overall trickiness of "my gospel" he tells of a deliverer coming
from Zion: Romans 11:26 - 27 " And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written: "The Deliverer will come out of Zion,
and He will turn away ungodliness from Jacob; For this is My covenant with them, when I take away their sins.''
Paul's area of truth is covered in more detail in the link "Creating myths from guile." But that link
is still being updated, yet it should suffice for now to show where areas of truth, and the areas of lies in "my
gospel" are told. And it should also show the area of truth about a deliverer that corresponds to the
coming of the son of man told by Jesus in the gospels.
There is information that is covered in more detail elsewhere in this website, sufficient to provide proof of what is
explained therein, on ideas that will only be quickly mentioned here. When Jesus spoke to his apostles alone
then he did not talk in metaphors, allegories, or fables. One such place is when Jesus explained what would be the sign
of His coming, and when would His kingdom be established on earth. In a similar way, Paul did not talk in
myths when he spoke of a person coming out of Zion, who would be a deliverer. In both places when either Jesus,
or Paul spoke the plain truth the reader needed to accept the process of reincarnation, or rebirth as a fact. That literal
idea of returning to earth, that was not a metaphor, would be required to understand that myths were not being told.
Of course most people would not consider what was said as a fable, or myth story, such as a person coming out of
Zion, but instead most would think that figures of speech were being used, and that these various figures
of speech should be analyzed to find a deeper meaning, but to do that would lead to endless conjecture, and the
true answer would never be found.
We should understand, and this idea emphasized, that Christians falsely believe they are never to consider that the NT
tells myth stories. Therefore they can not think in terms of allegories, parables, and so on in their interpretations, but
must look for figures of speech. Here is only one example of a figure of speech: "It is raining cats, and dogs."
That is odd, for it can not literally rain cats and dogs. As we know for those that this saying has been explained,
it means it is raining like a deluge.
So Bible interpreters are in for confusion in a fashion of great confusion sort of like it was raining cats and
dogs. They will have endless discussions as long as they do not accept that at times a myth, allegory, parable, or metaphor
is being told. And then again at times also take into consideration that something literal is being told like a deliverer
from Zion. All together the end result is that the Bible interpreters have drowned like in the days of Noah.
When rebirth is accepted, then nothing deeper needs to be looked for. When rebirth is accepted then all of the
other associated ideas spring forth in clarity and tells you that a person who once in a past life built a temple in Zion,
has returned to try again, Haggai 1:13 - 15, and hopefully succeed this time. In that past life when I was called Zerubbabel
I died before the temple in Zion was completed. God says in various OT, and NT prophecies, and even found in the
Qur'an, that this person who returns will succeed, and live to place the capstone upon the temple, so what do we
have to fear.
Again, on the surface concerning the "coming of the son of man," or a "deliverer from Zion" it may appear
metaphors, or even myths were told, but with the key of rebirth the truth can be understood. In the OT
prophecies of Zerubbabel there are allegories, along with literal facts, so that a living allegory was told. We will encounter
what are living allegories in numerous places in this site, and more examples will be found further below if the reader
has yet to understand that concept. In those instances in the OT, it makes what Jesus and Paul told in the NT to be
confusing. We are lead to wonder: When is something literal, and when is it a parable, or allegory. Of course
within the words Jesus spoke to his apostles at times analogies, that would be similes, were told for not until
recently has the Internet, computers and so on been invented. Therefore OT allegories, on top of NT allegories,
then encountering similes along with plain facts would confuse the ignorant reader to think all might be figures of speech,
or all are to be taken literally, and so on leading to endless discussions that never found the solution.
There are many similar ideas in life all around us where confusion has reigned for millions of years. With
that confusion came suffering. We can look at the human body as being at the level of complexity that the
NT, and OT were written. Today the human body genomes have been mapped to a good degree, and so has many other discoveries
been made so that many cures have been found. Why can not the same be done in religion?
The body is made by God, and so have the scriptures been given by God. If a person truly believes the scriptures
are God given, then those scriptures may be completely understood too so that superstitions in religion are cleared
away like the past superstitions on the diseases of the body. Today we know that witches did not bring
the black plague, but instead that was caused by fleas carrying the disease, that spread by the host of rats that
were carried on ships carrying cargo coming from North Africa to Europe.
On the idea of a deliverer: Jacob was later called Israel after he wrestled with a man, Genesis 32:28, and prevailed. The
man was an Adept, one who had evolved beyond the need for life experiences. From the struggle of Jacob with
a person evolved beyond the need for rebirth, came the children of Israel, who are related to the 12 signs of Zodiac.
Each human is born under one sign of the zodiac, life after life, typically entering a new sign each life so to gain new experiences.
Each person must wrestle with new experiences, and prevail if they wish to be blessed, and move on.
The rest of this website, in the other links such as "Home," "The bed is too short…", and "Creating myths
from guile" all together helps to fulfill prophecy about a deliverer coming out of Zion. For now much of this
link concerns the Christian "my gospel" with its correspondence to the Greek myth Odysseus.
In reality, this link only shows sufficient proof that a correspondence between the characters of Telemachus, and
Odysseus in "The Odyssey" can be found today with the characters of the reborn Paul, and reborn Peter in the
"my gospel" of Paul.
|
 |
|
Max Heindel, (1865 - 1919), who founded the Rosicrucian Fellowship, (RF) located in Oceanside, CA, was in a past life
the apostle Paul. This link will prove that fact by using the "Rosicrucian Cosmo-conception," (RCC) which is the book he authored
under the guidance of the Elder Brothers. A few other of his works will also be used to reinforce that original idea
found in the RCC that he was in a past life the apostle Paul. (No where else is a direct hint given on who he was, except
in the RCC.) The Elder Brothers, and Jesus are similar in evolutionary advancement, which is why they use that descriptive
epithet. The Elder Brother of the RF contacted me in the year 1978, and Jesus contacted me in 1977. Those true
stories, which talk of signs, and wonders are told elsewhere in this site.
The idea discussed in this link that shows that Max is saying he is the reborn apostle Paul, means nothing unless we then
investigate further so that we can substantiate that most likely Max was indeed Paul in a past life. We again must make
a theory, and then support it. However, no new theory needs to be proposed, as the first theory made elsewhere
on Home page that is called "The theory of the Mystery of God" need be the one and only theory, and what is
discovered here will continue to substantiate it.
The manner of transmission of the Elder Brother's teachings to Max, who as will be proven later was the reborn apostle
Paul, was similar to the transmission when he was Paul. When Saul, he had to be realigned so he stopped killing Christians,
but that took only a few days, afterward he was called Paul. Then a few years later, when in Arabia, Paul learned directly
from Jesus, who was in heaven, the teachings he was to preach. That showed that the Qur'an was to come, and be part of
the Christian teachings.
Two thousand years later, Max did not need to be knocked off of a horse in a blinding light, like happened 2000 years
ago when Jesus spoke to him, or have something similar happen such as knocked out of his car in a blinding light.
That miraculous event, soon after the time that Jesus had walked the earth, happened to hopefully stop
Paul, who was a very zealous Jewish priest called Saul, from killing the early converts to Christianity.
In his recent life, 1865 - 1919 CE, Paul remained reformed, but he had forgotten who he was in his past lives
as do almost all of us forget. (We cannot recall so we do not hold to past glories, or failures, where family influence
may have been the reason for failure or success, or continue to hate old enemies, but are given a clean start. Those
being only a few of the reasons our memory of the past is removed. ) When Paul was reborn, and finally by
occult means he recalled who he was, then he changed his birth name of Carl Grasshoff, and took the name Max Heindel. So
he repeated changing his name again, like he had after learning to embrace Christianity during the time that Peter was
still alive. In addition to changing his name other similarities could be noted. Saul was born
of wealth, and had a dignified parentage. Carl was born of wealth, and had a dignified parentage too.
About a hundred years ago, Max went to Austria to receive the teachings given to him from the inner worlds, or from
heaven. Austria is about the same distance from Greece as, when Max was called Paul, is the distance
from Jerusalem to Arabia. This shows that now the Greek myths, and other world religions are to be included in the Christian
teachings. This then allows Rome, the Vatican to be defeated, or reformed, and the true nature of Christianity to be
revealed. The Qur'an revealed the truth about Jesus, now the RCC, although not a holy book, but a book from man, reveals
the truth about the Bible, and the truth about evolution: That man someday will evolve to be like the angels, who
gave the messages of God to men.
For a few paragraphs below, maybe about five pages long, there will be a number of topics covered that do not necessarily
prove that Max was at one time the apostle Paul. Please keep your mind open to learning about a few different ideas,
even presented so they appear unconnected to one another. Not much later the original topic of proving who
Max was in a previous life will begin.
Since most people have not read the RCC yet, and much of this related information they are reading here is new to them,
then all of this may seem confusing, and beyond belief. All I can ask is that the reader continue, and if
at times they are wondering what is going on, that they go on in faith and keep reading. Eventually things will make sense. If
this site were constructed like Wikipedia, where every new idea that it is believed the average reader has no knowledge, that
a link is supplied that goes to a good background on that new idea, then what is written here would likely make more sense.
In Wikipedia a person can spend sometimes several hours, even days going to one link after another simply to understand an
idea given in the original subject under investigation. Wikipedia is written by what appears at times to be geniuses.
So if their method of enlightenment may at time involve hours, or days of background reading to understand the original
subject, so the reader should consider that what is in this website is simply something the reader must accept as new
information. There is nothing that can be done in either situation if the reader simply wants an easy explanation
on a difficult, and never before understood subject matter. Therefore if the reader wants to be informed in this
case of this particular website, they simply must accept what is read in one area, and later hopefully they will recall when
it is needed in another area, and when the time comes all will fit together. So now we continue on.
When I received my message in 1998, an angel delivered it to me. There after I studied the Qur'an and Bible
like I had never done before. I realized from that investigation that the two, Bible, and Qur'an, supported one
another. After that, a couple of years later I returned to study more thoroughly the RCC, and the other of
his writings finding that what I learned since the angel's visit about the Bible, and Qur'an was already included
in the works by Max. But it was hidden from the surface understanding by using a Cabalistic style of writing.
The point I hope to make is that, as will be found in the works by Max, that humans have lead humanity on longer than most
of us ever thought in the form of Kings, and Queens. They at one time were considered like God, and were divine
rulers. Today most Kings, and Queens are not like those human rulers of long ago. Not all degenerated, but many
times that idea of Kings, and so on did.
For example, Hirohito, (1901 - 1989 CE) the 124th ruler of Japan, and all of the prior rulers were considered
by the Japanese to be divine, or God incarnate. Christians believe in something similar except their God died,
then ascended to heaven where he continues to look after those who so believe. The Japanese simply kept their
God on earth, a more practical approach, verses Christians taking their God to now dwell in heaven.
According to Max, as taught him by the Elder Brothers, there are people who are part of our humanity that
are very evolved, that live on the planets Venus, and Mercury. Some of those came to earth and were our good
Kings and Queens of long, long ago, prior to recorded history. Hard to believe, but that incredibility does not
matter. The reason this information is told here, is to help the reader understand that what the angels give
to humans, and what the advanced humans give to us as well, are not confused thinking they are both the same. The desired
results are the same, but again one group are human leaders, and the other are angels.
The angels are more powerful and are able to influence humanity by subtle means, or we might say the angels fool the humans
into doing the correct thing. Where as before when we had divine human rulers the more backward human, by comparison, (That
includes nearly all of us on earth today) followed the orders unconditionally. Later the humans evolved enough
so they rebelled against the divine rulers, but the angels were still able to manipulate humanity so that most of us would correctly
evolve.
Therefore what happened to me when the angel arrived, only proved that some very advanced humans had done before
what that one angel informed me of recently. That offers some proof that the human leaders we once obeyed
without question are still around, but they now work in different ways to help humanity. Only those humans that are
willing to take orders again will be helped, otherwise we, including myself it appears, will be manipulated by angels.
The angel that visited me only gave me a hint to look at things a little closer. I won't explain in more
detail here what I am getting at as the better explanation should appear once the RCC is read. But don't
read the RCC, and the other RF works until this link here is finished, unless you are a genius. That ends
one small insight on how angels, and advanced humans work together that will only make sense after this link is read,
and then the RCC is studied.
The manner of transmission when called Max was the almost same, 1 Galatians 1:11 - 19, but this time the teacher was
a friend of Jesus Christ, who was Lazarus. The book Max authored called the RCC, written under the direction
of Lazarus, (who later renamed himself Christian Rosenkreuz) and likewise so too are many of his other letters are like
his previous letters long ago in the NT, full of mysteries, also good doctrine, even cunning lies, but logic
can clear up any of their hidden meaning.
The reason for that type of teaching by Paul is so that the heavenly host, including those who are wicked, (The fallen
angels) can manipulate us rebellious humans: Thereby teaching us a good lesson so maybe we might want to learn
the proper path of evolution, instead of rebelling so much of the time. Still we see this leaves the choice to
ourselves, but there will be consequences to endure, either good or bad depending if we did the right thing or the wrong thing.
The consequences may not appear until after death, so do not be fooled thinking a full life with luxuries means
you are on the right path: Maybe you are, maybe you are not. You could be fooled.
The life of Jesus is considered by many occultists to be the path of the mystic, or the heart. The life of Lazarus
is considered to be the path of the occultist, or what we call today the scientist: the path of the mind: using discernment.
So we see the connection in Austria, where some of the most brilliant people on earth are found is the path that
shows us what are the mysteries, and the meaning of the NT.
In Arabia, where the Qur'an was later given, was where Paul first received his teaching from Jesus. Mohammed,
like Jesus, also shows the path of the mystic. It would appear then that most of humanity is following the
path of the mind for otherwise most of the world would not need my assistance, and the planet would be at peace right now.
If it appears that most humans have little intelligence, then we may understand that they have even less of a heart.
So, logically the path of the mind will be the one that develops the soul for the great bulk of humanity. That is my
personal prediction, and the reborn Paul shares it too.
When called Paul he wrote down mysteries, but he gave no penetrating explanation on what they might mean. IF one
were a saint then they would know the meaning. Today the masses, most of those who are not saints, are taught, Ephesians
6:18 - 20, what before only the saints understood. In our modern world Paul, reborn called Max, would again boldly preach
the mysteries, but this time he would include an explanation that a babe in Christ could understand.
Within the RCC, Max will also show that Jesus was not crucified, but most will think he said that Jesus was crucified.
On the surface of the RCC, the only view most readers see, Max clearly states that Jesus was crucified. However, as water
refracts light so the object appears in one position, but when one quickly reaches in to catch, say, a fish, then
we reach in a place the fish is not, in a like manner Max uses a Cabbalistic like method of hiding that knowledge. That
OT method is his water that bends the light, but by using logic, which is one of the keys used to unlock scripture, that
same idea of an uncrucified Jesus, who passes over the cross can be easily found.
In addition, one other of his works will be used to further prove that the cross is symbolism, and that therefore
Jesus could not be crucified. To take the crucifixion merely literally for Jesus, would be to remove the symbolism in that
sign. Instead of only one event the crucifixion must be both literal, and symbolic. That can only happen when one
person is made a look alike for Jesus, and the real Jesus escapes.
Whenever Jesus told a parable, the story had to include ideas that could by analogy be fit to a real world event,
or character. To think that one was crucified, died, and then came back to life has no similar analogous event
in the world. Therefore we have to accept that somehow Jesus did not really die, for there is nothing
in the world that completely dies, where all life functions fail for several days, but then comes back to life in
the same identical physical structure that before had died, and began the decay process.
For example, some plants like fruit trees become dormant during winter, but if they die, like grain, they never return
to life. Grain must be reseeded, and then it begins from a sprout until it grows into maturity. Jesus did not begin again
as an infant after the crucifixion, and so we must conclude Jesus never died.
Most know of people who have died, but were brought back to life by artificial means of resuscitation. Those
methods are futile if the time of death is too long. Without means to revive them within a few minutes, the
brain would soon die, and if they were not revived there after only a few minutes longer, that more of the body would
die, until at last within a few hours rigor mortis would set in. If the body is kept chilled, then all of the time
for the death of various organs are delayed, but still there is a limit even then.
In my instance, where I died in my sleep, no doubt only a minute or less occurred before I was brought back from what in
most instances, almost 100% of the time, would have lead to a death that allowed for no return, even if hours
later there were human, or angelic intervention. Even the angels can not defy the laws of God, so they have
only so much time allowed to bring a person back to life. Of course suspended animation is not death, and in that state
one can be brought back hours, or days later, because they never died in the first place.
But the person who looked like Jesus bleed out, or as a result of blood loss soon died from shock. He could not be
brought back to life. Therefore the reason for a look alike. The real Jesus could return, and appear brought back from
death. He could appear to defy the laws of God, and thereby make people believe he was God.
The great majority of the students in the RF took the crucifixion to be only literally for Jesus, all the
while they accepted that the crucifixion also implied the symbolism of the sun crossing the vernal equinox, going from
the cold of winter, where is death, into the warmth of summer to begin life again. They accepted the annual cycle of
plants, where in spring the crops are planted, then comes summer where they ripen, which is followed by the harvest
in Autumn, and finally the death of the plants in winter, which cycle is symbolized by what Jesus did
for all of us. By the return of Jesus from "a death" on the cross he came back to give an impulse of
love to mankind, and Christ, like the sun, does this cycle annually.
We see that the above analogy on plants, explained elsewhere by Max, can not alone fit what happened on the cross,
but other analogies Max told did fit if two analogies were used to explain one event. Max had to make for confounding
verses for, as we will see below, during his life time it was not the time to reveal the truth on the subject of the
crucifixion. Of course we can easily say that Max did reveal the truth, but because his method of giving hints was
so obscure that it can be said that for most of humanity, if they did not have an explanation like found here, that
he never told the truth.
Since two people were involved in one crucifixion, then there are two truths operating simultaneously, which causes confusion
that such can occur as it defies common sense. There is the truth of the analogy of planting, and harvesting of
grain, where one person from Arabia lived, then his life harvested where he died on the cross as the look alike of Jesus,
and about five hundred years later his body was reseeded to begin the cycle again when he was reborn from a mother’s
human womb. In his future life he would be reborn as Mohammed the Prophet, where from his previous life he had now gathered
together in his next a greater harvest in the work of benefiting humanity. There is also the analogy of a tree being
seeded, growing to bear fruit, then lying dormant during winter, until spring returns again, so that without dying it bears
fruit every season, which happened in the life of Jesus Christ, who did not die, but escaped due to looking like the person
who carried his cross. The body of Jesus is still in a dormant state, while his spirit ascended to heaven.
His living body is buried in a secret place on earth, and he will not be seen walking about until the reborn Peter, the
coming of the son of man’s work is complete. Peter's work is like a farmer, who prunes the tree, and prepares
for the next season.
The farmer Peter, reborn today, in this analogy is not able to prune the tree, fertilize, and so on every year. Another
season concerning him means a longer period than the annual cycle of fruit production. Still if the tree is watered,
such as by rain, even if the farmer is dead, it will yield fruit every year to be harvested by anyone that so desires. So
in that manner does Christ yield a beneficial assistance to everyone on earth annually even when the farmer is dead.
Unfortunately it is not as simple as that.
For those who have traveled around citrus fields, etc., they will find trees up rooted due to tornados, or here in Florida
due to hurricanes. There are also pests, fungus, and diseases that invade so that sometime entire groves,
or orchards must be removed, and replanted. Jude 1:12 “These are spots in your love feasts, while they feast with
you without fear, serving only themselves; they are clouds without water, carried about by the winds; late autumn trees without
fruit, twice dead, pulled up by the roots;” 17 - 19 “But you, beloved, remember the words which were
spoken before by the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ: how they told you that there would be mockers in the last time
who would walk according to their own ungodly lusts. These are sensual persons, who cause divisions, not having the
Spirit.”
But the farmer is back, and so the groves will be inspected, and removal, and replanting done where required.
So in our inspection we will see many analogies concerning "a death" on the cross, which will be explained when
the subject of the crucifixion is covered later. By using "a death" on the cross we see no name
was mentioned, which allows us to plug in the correct answer of whose death it was, once we have found the correct conclusion.
Here we see an example of similar trickery in the NT in the book of Hebrews 9:15 "And for this cause he is
the mediator of a new covenant, that a death having taken place for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the
first covenant, they that have been called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance."
One clue that will be used to prove that Max was the apostle Paul involves the subtle clue above " a death
having taken place." Paul never states whose death it was. Why did he not simply say that it was Jesus,
but he did not? Just like when Paul said that the church will be lead to myths. Why did not Paul say that
is when the apostasy starts? Again he did not say when it began, but the reader thought they knew, and so
they mislead themselves. The church refused to learn myths, all the while they were lead astray by wrong doctrine. That
type of behavior is childishness.
Max wrote the book of Hebrews when he was the apostle Paul, which book has both mature solid food for adults,
and also milk for the babes in Christ, which will mislead the babe in Christ reader if they are not aware of the
many subtle hints, which to them are too obscure to understand. Those ideas are covered in detail in
the link "Creating myths from guile."
Concerning the RCC, and the students of the organization that Max established. Because Max was accepted as an
authority, then when he openly stated that Jesus was crucified, the student looked no further, all the while many
times Max hinted for them not to only look on the surface of what he taught. He gave them many hints to show
he would at times teach using guile, but they did not understand. Of course for many years I did what they did,
proving that I was not a genius. But I did have a reason for my accepting the many apparent errors, which otherwise
should have made me leave, and never return.
My reasons for searching for more answers to life led me to the book the RCC, but it did not show me what I wished to know.
So I went to other organizations like the Theosophical Society, which helped a bit, but still I was not satisfied. I
then came back to the RF, and read more of their works. Eventually I was satisfied, but I noticed that Max had
a number of contradictions, particularly concerning items related to the crucifixion, so that I was once again thinking of
leaving. However, that is when the Elder Brother came to me, and let me know that I should stay in the RF by showing
me his mastery on occult principles. After his demonstration, I then accepted all contradictions in any of Max’s books
as something that would someday be later cleared away. For about twenty years I never once thought that I would be the
one to clear the contradictions away.
Very few would ever believe that the works by Max that they were reading were designed to have some similarities
to the NT, so that it would mislead them, but all at the same time, when one has the occult key, which is simply logic,
all the confusion could be cleared away.
Only after the Archangel Michael spoke to me in 1998, which happened about twenty years after I first read the works by
Max, where now Michael gave me a hint, did I finally see the truth that Max had fooled me a number of times.
Many current RF members have finally learned what I have learned, after they read my website, but
they are too worldly to want to join in, and endure hardship to spread the word. Jesus encountered the same type
of people in his day, who were those who said they liked him, but they preferred to follow the already established priesthood
instead. By their so doing, and since the priesthood wished to murder Jesus, then Jesus called all of them, in
fact the entire world in a figurative sense, as people "Hating me without a cause."
What little on this subject of “The Prince of the Power of air” that is introduced here will help the
reader to understand why they should be cautious on being a member of the RF. We will find over and over again
that the works by Paul in the NT when called Paul, and his works today in the RF when called Max, that he continues to make
things like a puzzle. Until the puzzle is understood then more problems than we would like can happen. Here
follows one example, where hopefully today a bit of a solution is applied to Max's puzzle, taken from the RCC Page
350:
“The Ego works directly through the blood. The Race-spirit guides the Races by working in the blood, as the
group-spirit guides the animals of its species through the blood. So also does the Ego control its own vehicle, but with a
difference.
The Ego operates by means of the heat of the blood, while the Race (i.e., tribal, or family) spirit
works by means of the air, as it is drawn into the lungs. That is why Jehovah, or His messengers, "breathed into man's
nostrils," thereby securing admission for the Race-spirit, Community-spirits, etc. ((My Ross note: But the fallen
angels gain access to humans, making them think they are correct, also by this same means of the air.
So angels and fallen angels manipulate humanity. The fallen angels used the spinal column of infant humanity, that is
humanity long ago, to give pictures to the brain. But when that first happened it was millions of years ago. Today
the fallen angles can do much of what the regular angels can do. Fallen angels evolve too. ))
The different classes of Race-spirits guided their peoples to various climates and different parts of the Earth.
To the trained clairvoyant, a tribal-spirit appears as a cloud enveloping and permeating the atmosphere of the whole country
inhabited by the people under its dominion. Thus are produced the different peoples and nations. Paul spoke of "The Prince
of the Power of the Air"; or "principalities and powers," etc., showing that he knew of the Race-spirits, but now not even
an attempt is made to understand what they mean, although their influence is strongly felt. ((My Ross note: I have
attempted to show what it means.)) Patriotism is one of the sentiments emanating from and fostered by them.
It has not now so much power over people as formerly. There are some who are being liberated from the Race-spirit and can
say with Thomas Paine, "The world is my country." There are those who can leave father and mother and look upon all men as
brothers."
Now compare that with what Paul talked about in the NT Ephesians 2:1-10 "And you He made alive, who were dead in
trespasses and sins, in which you once walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the
power of the air, the spirit who now works in the sons of disobedience, among whom also we all once conducted ourselves
in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, just
as the others. But God, who is rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us, even when we were dead in
trespasses, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved), and raised us up together, and made us sit
together in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, that in the ages to come He might show the exceeding riches of His grace
in His kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves;
it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast. For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus
for good works, which God prepared beforehand that we should walk in them.”
Paul teaches to have faith in the NT, but in fact he really wants the person to discriminate. Unfortunately most
of humanity can not, and so they continue on in faith, even if their faith has been corrupted such as has happened today. Humanity's intellect
was not too good back then, and today it has changed very little.
When we consider that the Christianity today is not the same as in Paul’s time, and if we accept that the Prince
of the Power of Air has taken control of the church, so it then is in many ways again fulfilling the desires of the flesh,
and mind, such as Patriotism: USA is number one, Democracy is to be spread around the world, even if lies must be told
of other nations, so that the USA may complete its manifest destiny.
Manifest destiny was fine to create a USA nation of from "sea to shining sea," but then let this nation by example
be a model for others, so if others desire they may become like the USA. But do not use secret means to infiltrate
democratic ideas when many nations are not ready to have a democracy, and its people would find it counter productive
to be a democracy.
As Home page pointed out, our democracy today is not really what it is suppose to be. The Prince of the Power of
the Air has altered it to become something like a dictatorial government, where propaganda, and intense feelings of nationalism
make for a government that tries all it can to make it appear democratic.
Religions were given to each nation that were best suited for its people, and the same holds for governments even if the
governments are truly democratic. Democracy can only survive if the news will report all things honestly, where
national security is considered making the nation secure from all things corrupt, not covering up a political system that has
become corrupt such as in the USA today. Sorry to go off on a tangent.
It is said that the housing market collapse was what created the fall in the overall economy. That happened
when the Government allowed "liar loans" in order that minorities could qualify for loans, and that racial prejudice
might be eliminated.
If what was said above does not make sense, then that person should likely read a book on how blacks have been
treated in the past in the housing market to know what I am talking about. Of course hardly a book will be written on
why "liars loans," as it makes the great USA that tells every other nation to be like us, to instead be something that others
should not copy. We have become today like the Jews of old that God said: Exocus 32:7 - 9 " And the Lord said
to Moses, "Go, get down! For your people whom you brought out of the land of Egypt (From Europe to the USA) have corrupted
themselves. They have turned aside quickly out of the way which I commanded them. They have made themselves a molded
calf, (Many corrupt US policies) and worshiped it and sacrificed to it, and said, `This is your god, O Israel,
that brought you out of the land of Egypt!' And the Lord said to Moses, "I have seen this people, and indeed it is a
stiff-necked people!"
So others, not black, took the liar loans, who had money, taking advantage of those loans and then turned
it into an investment scheme. If anyone thinks that is a stupid idea so housing discrimination can be eliminated, well
so it proves to be.
If a person can see that spreading democracy is not of Christ, but instead many times today is one
nation fighting against the others, which facts today prove the majority can not see, then we may understand that Paul
was told to test humanity. If they won't think, then test them and let the results teach a lesson so maybe they
will want to learn to think. What is the conclusion, for me anyway: That humanity has for the most part failed to accept
Christ. Even some of the members of the RF who think they are saints, but would openly say they are not, have for the
most part failed, and are guided along by the Prince of the power of the air. If they could put their ego aside, not
care how people look at them, they may succeed again.
What the reader will soon find explained below, by the reborn apostle Paul, contains either a deeper meaning laying
beneath an unsightly garment, which is like the Zohar explains of the Torah, or these are error after error made by an
author who later wishes you to believe he has a meaningful explanation on an expansive subject, on cosmology, the creation
of the universe, that requires the most sublime intellect, as well as high grade clairvoyant sight to be able to investigate
that area. If the reader does not believe the insight shown below, added by the reborn apostle Peter, then who
ever accepts the surface teachings while ignoring this added insight proves they are as big a fool as are those who believe
that Jesus is God. If the author of the RF can make so many simple errors, on things easily proven right, or wrong,
why believe him on ideas that even Albert Einstein could not explain, unless within the errors a deeper idea is meant to be
found?
Here begins a quick look at the place in the RCC, which proves Max was the reborn apostle Paul. After that, then
a proof that Jesus was not crucified will be shown. This will also prove, by one more of many other proofs, that I am
the reborn apostle Peter. Below we will look at excerpts from pages 169 - 171 of the RCC. In only three pages will many deeper
truths be found.
The use of double parenthesis (( )) with explanations within is inserted in the text below, which
are not part of the original book, in order to help us see how to read between the lines, and find a deeper truth
within. The reader should, in fact must click on every link when they come to one, in order to pick up the deeper clues on
how to read between the lines.
Max begins by explaining about our past state of belief on spiritual matters, and how we "dallied his time away without
developing the resources of the world, as do the people of India today, for the same reason." But, it was time
now for us to conquer the physical world. For that reason wine, or alcohol was introduced. Here follows the rest of
his work
---------------------------------------
“Hitherto only water had been used as a drink and in the ceremonies of the Temple service, but after the submergence
of Atlantis--a continent which once existed between Europe and America, where the Atlantic Ocean now lies--those who escaped
destruction began to cultivate the vine and make wine, as we find narrated in the Bible story of Noah.((Here we find a hint
of the time we are approaching today: "As in the days of Noah, so will be the coming of the son of man." Max will
eventually give many hints on the name in a past life of the one, who will be that son of man today, so
that together he has practically shouted out the name of that person. )) Noah symbolizes the remnant
of the Atlantean Epoch, which became the nucleus of the Fifth Race--therefore our progenitors.
(( There are many examples of what a remnant means in the Bible, here are a few that relates to the past, and to the time
today.
Here is when Jesus walked on earth: Isaiah 28:5 " In that day the Lord of hosts will be for a
crown of glory and a diadem of beauty to the remnant of His people "
Here talks about the time when Peter, and Paul were alive after Jesus ascended to heaven: Romans 9:27
Isaiah also cries out concerning Israel: "Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, the
remnant will be saved.
And soon follows in Romans this verse, which is about Peter as he is reborn life, after life: Romans 9:33
As it is written: "Behold, I lay in Zion a stumbling stone and rock of offense, and whoever believes on Him will not
be put to shame.''
Here is a verse on the remnant (still in the book of Romans in the portion where the truth, and riddles are told) where
the “present time” includes the time up until the son of man comes: Romans 11:5 Even
so then, at this present time there is a remnant according to the election of grace.
Here are verses that Peter uses found in Acts 2:20-21, taken from Joel, that relates to “as in the days of Noah“
: Joel 2:31-32 "The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the coming of the great
and terrible day of the Lord. And it shall come to pass that whoever calls on the name of the Lord shall be saved."
But Peter does not include all of the verses, and so like a riddle we must see what else does this time include.
Here are the verses that follow immediately, only found in Joel 2:32 "For in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem there shall
be deliverance, as the Lord has said, among the remnant whom the Lord calls."
The verses above say “before the terrible day of the Lord.” That means first must signs of the
sun turned to darkness be shown, and so on, which is what is found in a nuclear winter. Then after that someday, which
someday corresponds to the standards of evolution, which can involve millions of years, then the second coming of Christ will
come whether prepared or not. By that time many people will have entered into the second coming of Christ, and will
gladly look forward to the terrible day for the many others who are not prepared when Christ returns to end life on earth.
That means another day like in the days of Noah will happen, but that future one is maybe millions of years away.
Here the word remnant is not found, but the product of those who are chosen by their deeds, or by their fruit, who will
be the remnant are the ones found in these verses written down by the prophet Daniel. Daniel lived around
580 BC :
Daniel 12:9-10 "And he said, "Go your way, Daniel, for the words are closed up and sealed till the time
of the end. Many shall be purified, made white, and refined, but the wicked shall do wickedly; and none of
the wicked shall understand, but the wise shall understand. "
In order for the verses in Daniel 12:9-10 to be fulfilled, that tells of an end to come, like when Noah saw the end
of his generation, where only a remnant remained to start the seed of the next race, so then will we need to see a time come
where miracles of righteousness, and a preacher of righteousness appears that a new attitude may be instilled within
humanity. The new attitude would be loving God, where we learn the mature teachings on what that means, more
than loving man, and what man wants to teach us on how to behave. The scientific method will allow that to happen
so that humans may intelligently differentiate between the laws of God, and the laws of man that may go against the laws
of God. Then doing works that show that change. This son of man today is part of the remnant who
has returned, according to the election of grace, upon whom the church of Jesus Christ will be built upon. ))
The active principle of alcohol is a "spirit" and as the humanity of the earlier Epochs used the articles of food best
suited to their vehicles, so this spirit was, in the Fifth Epoch, added to the foods previously used by evolving humanity.
It acts upon the spirit of the Fifth Epoch man, temporarily paralyzing it, that it may know, esteem and conquer the physical
world and value it at its proper worth. Thus man forgets, for the time being, his spiritual home, clinging to this form of
existence, which he has previously despised, with all the tenacity born of a feeling that this is all there is--or at least,
preferring the certainty of this world to taking chances on a heaven which, in his present muddled state, he does not understand.
Water only had been used in the Temples, but now this is altered. "Bacchus," a god of wine, ((Bacchus did not need to be
mentioned. Max only needed to say Wine was introduced. Bacchus is his hint that the NT myth story is
based upon the earlier Greek myths, which is told in more detail in the link "Creating Myths from Guile." )) appears
and under his sway the most advanced nations forget that there is a higher life. None who offer tribute to the counterfeit
spirit of wine or any alcoholic liquor (the product of fermentation and decay) can ever know anything of the higher Self--the
true Spirit which is the very source of life.
(( The phrase “none who offer tribute” emphasizes the idea that alcohol is more of a remedy, on various
occasions, to make an event more tolerable. If our life is based upon earning a living so later we may party then we
offer tribute to alcohol. Jesus, Paul, and all of the apostles drank alcohol in moderation. Paul, 1 Timothy 5:23, said
that a little wine is beneficial. There is never one time in the NT where Jesus, or any of his close disciples
were found mentally impaired by alcohol, and yet here is what Jesus said he was called: Matthew 11: 18-19 "For
John came neither eating nor drinking, and they say, `He has a demon.' The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and
they say, `Look, a gluttonous man and a winebibber, a friend of tax collectors and sinners!' But wisdom is justified by her
children.''
The Qur’an if read correctly shows that if there is no benefit at all from using alcohol, say as a remedy for the
body, or to make a social event more tolerable, then alcohol should not be used. Otherwise it is OK, but moderation
is the key so we do not go to excess and are tempted by the devil.
There are some Christians, Matthew 26:29, who say they will not drink alcohol because Jesus said just a few
days before he departed earth that he will not drink of the vine anymore. If a person is that stupid, not being able
to realize that you can't drink alcohol when you don't have a physical body, which was soon to be the case for Jesus,
then I agree with those people as their mind is too feeble where even one shot of alcohol would likely impair
their judgment so they were easily tempted by the devil. Jesus said that when he returns he will once again drink
alcohol, so we should easily see that if Jesus were here in body right now that we would at times find him drinking.
Not drinking alcohol will not make the Father's kingdom come any quicker. Only deeds of righteousness will hasten
that day. Those who do not drink alcohol because they can not reason properly, also are not able to see that their
deeds they call righteous, are not really righteous at all.
There is no great reason to drink alcohol if anyone cares not to. There are other ways to benefit the stomach
without using alcohol. For 14 years, from the age of 24 to age 38 years I never touched a drop of alcohol,
and even made sure that the Vanilla extract I used was alcohol free. I did drink grape juice, which in many ways is the
equivalent of wine, but without the alcohol. From the age of 38 there on I drank socially. Then for an entire
year at age 58 I went without drinking alcohol once again, but I now drink socially.
A large helping of the typical food served at lunch, or dinner that was prepared alcohol free, that is no alcohol
was added to it, is still said to have the equivalent of one half beer of alcohol in it due to the natural
fermentation of food. So it is rather hard not to have some amount of alcohol in our diet no matter what we do. ))
All this was preparatory to the coming of Christ, and it is of the highest significance that His first act was to
change "water into wine." (John 2:11.) (( Here is the quote of John 2:11 "This beginning of signs Jesus
did in Cana of Galilee, and manifested His glory; and His disciples believed in Him." The introductory portion
of this web site called "Home page" should have been read first before starting this link: "The reborn apostle Paul."
If the reader has decided to read this link before finishing Home page they may not be prepared for the trickery
of Max, which is found in his many works, where some is explained in this link. Also, if any idea
explained here seems far fetched at first, keep an open mind, for eventually many other corroborating details will dovetail
so that the reader should no longer have any doubts.
Max begins talking about miracles by introducing one deed of Jesus by saying it was "His first act,"
and as we see above it is in italic print.
When italic print is found in the works of Max, that is a hint to look deeper. His first act of changing "water to wine"
can be accepted as true, so long as we confine ourselves to only the area of Cana. But since it is italicized, then
we should realize that more can be found if we will investigate. For example, the first time Max uses italic print is
in his opening poem titled "Creed or Christ." Here is the place:
"At His request the Universal Spirit came
To all the churches; not to one alone
On Pentecostal morn a tongue of flame
Round each apostle as a halo shone."
When the first churches were established that all would be true, but later, after the "Lawless One," 2 Thess 2:8-12,
arrived around the year 325 AD, then that was no longer valid for each church. Since then like vultures ravenous with
greed, various churches have oftened battled one another for an empty name.
We see above in the poem that each is also italicized, which applies to the apostles. Therefore a deeper
message is implied that deals with the apostles, which idea is found here in this web site. That deeper message
is that Max, and Dan, who are two reborn apostles will reveal to you who is the Lawless One, and of course will have to reveal
many other ideas in order to prove that fact.
Returning to look more closely at His first act. The Book of Acts is the record of the deeds,
and preaching of the apostles after Jesus ascended into Heaven. We are therefore introduced to the idea that a
continuation of the preaching of the apostles who are, as we will soon find, bound by the command of "Tell no one who is Jesus the
Christ" is still in effect. So lies, found on the surface of Max's explanation, must be told concerning the crucifixion
until the archangel Michael, the prince of the Jews, tells otherwise, which change happened when Michael recently
spoke to me. The book of Acts is concerned primarily with the actions of Peter, and Paul.
When Paul returned, or was reborn, one of his first acts in the RCC was to explain that rebirth was an esoteric
Christian teaching for about 2000 years that today is to be taught publicly. Then when Peter returns the second act
in the same book is the esoteric teaching that Jesus was not crucified, and that today this is also to
be taught publicly. In the meantime, the reborn Peter and Paul will do other acts that are found elsewhere in the works
of the RF, and that also can be found in, and around the world. Peter can say something similar to what Jesus
said at John 4:48 , but in his own words "You will no doubt not believe unless you see many miracles, and unless you
use logic."
Max above told of "the coming of Christ," then he gave a hint of the next level that the teachings
of Christ would be explained publicly by using "His first act," and then he immediately gave an example, John 2:11,
which like "the son of man" if not understood will lead you astray. Max, who is under the direction of the Elder
Brothers, knew that I would sift through the guile in the NT, and find that the "water to wine" was not the first miracle.
In fact the word "act" is never found in the gospels to describe even one miracle of Jesus. We are therefore
left with a hint that we are dealing with a similar event in modern times that is like the acts of old, where Peter,
and Paul preach the word of God.
In order to see that "His first act" is guile, we will investigate a few verses in the NT, and find that Jesus had
performed other miracles prior to changing water to wine, the only problem is, is that most of those other miracles are not
described in any detail. All we are told is that Jesus performed miracles. Changing water to wine was
the first of the signs, and wonders that occurred when Jesus was at Cana, that is, it appears to be the first due to
the way the verse is written. It leads one to believe Jesus did not do any miracles previous to Cana. However,
why could not this miracle have taken place earlier, Luke 4:13 - 37, where Jesus announces for the first time who He
is by introducing prophecy which explains why the many miracles, and then he soon performs a miracle of changing
his identity, just like is clearly shown he can do the same, Matthew 24:13 - 31, after the crucifixion.
It is possible that the miracle of Jesus changing his appearance happened before changing water to wine. One
thing for certain we will learn here is that changing water to wine was not the first miracle. We can also say
for certain that the first secret miracle, or the first miracle that was so unexpected, and beyond belief, which caused most
people never to know a miracle happened was the time Jesus changed his appearance that he might not be murdered.
From this simple insight explained here, we should be willing to classify the miracles of Jesus into at least
two different groups: One group of miracles would be those that happened that most people never could believe
happened, so the miracles were ignored. Those types of miracles require logic to reveal. The second group of miracles
would be those that most anyone upon seeing would say was a miracle, where the discernment needed would involve little
or no thinking at all.
When Jesus performed a miracle during the time he was about to be killed by being thrown off a steep cliff of a hill,
which miracle allowed him to escape, which was where he transformed himself so he was not recognized, that miracle
very possibly happened prior to changing water to wine. The gospels talk about miracles without giving any
specific description, then we read about one miracle that is not recognized by most people as a miracle, then finally
we read about a miracle, that claims to be his first, but that miracle is told to be his first while at Cana.
Returning to the miracle that most people never considered to be a miracle, but those people who were considerably more intelligent
saw as plain as day that it was a miracle. Simple logic tells us there is no other way possible for Jesus, who
was protected only by himself, when surrounded by over a dozen people bent on his death, to escape unless he
changed his appearance, and walked away: Luke 4:30 "Then passing through the midst of them, He went His
way." Of course other verses show Jesus could also vanish, but the verses here say Jesus merely
walked away.
This feat of Jesus by analogy parallels what Max said about our focusing on the physical world thereby forgetting
the realities of the spiritual, and our having a muddled state of mind. This miracle, which may have been performed
before the first miracle of Jesus while he was at Cana, shows the manner in which Jesus escapes death when he is
about to be killed the final time at the crucifixion, except at that time he changes the appearance of both himself, and another,
who was Simon of Cyrene.
Concerning the other miracles that were never described in any detail, (not those that were secret miracles) we read
in the gospels that while in his home town of Nazareth, Jesus was unable to perform many miracles of healing due to the
disbelief of the people there. Because Jesus could not heal in Nazareth like he had in other towns then Jesus said
to his town folk, Luke 4:23, "You will surely say this proverb to Me, `Physician, heal yourself! Whatever we have
heard done in Capernaum, do also here in Your country.' ''
That quote implies that at one level, which is obvious, that the town people thought if Jesus were
to get his own life in order first, then they might be more believing. Since Jesus had been absent from Nazareth for
about 17 years, then to suddenly return without having a good excuse, like: while he was gone he got married, fathered
several children, and generated some prosperity all to show he was a good family man, and hard worker, then they might
be more inclined to accept him. Jesus could have said anything else, but he chose that quote because at another
level, which the town folk did not understand, which is like the parables of Jesus, that he would in a manner of
speaking “heal himself” by a transformation in order not to die. Jesus had foreknowledge, so he hinted at
the miracle he would perform before he performed it.
The clear implication that the town folks had about Jesus was that he turned from being a good son, and a person respected
among the community into a playboy, or a bum, who like the prodigal son had finally returned after losing it
all. Jesus was on the mend, but the town folks expected him to fall again into his old ways, what ever they were during
his long 17 year absence.
Here are some more verses that show that Jesus was not very well known by his community. Before reading them think
about this: Should we believe that Jesus was only a common person all the time that he lived in his community,
but then suddenly after about 18 years in the community as a plain Joe that now he appears to be both a genius, and a great
magician? The community is wondering where did he get this power, so either they had not known him, and he just
showed up after a long absence, or Jesus some how was a common Joe who overnight became a super star.
What makes more sense?
After all, if he lived right there in town for 18 years, they would have seen glimpses of this wondrous man
doing great deeds before. If that were true then they would not question him one bit, but if instead Jesus suddenly
came home, and few recall who he was then is not that reason the better explanation for the following verses? :
Matthew 13: 54-56 “ And when He had come to His own country, He taught them in their synagogue, so that they
were astonished and said, "Where did this Man get this wisdom and these mighty works? Is this not the carpenter's son? Is
not His mother called Mary? And His brothers James, Joses, Simon, and Judas? And His sisters, are they not all with
us? Where then did this Man get all these things?''
Is the reader still doubtful that they are finally learning
the truth on the life of Jesus? Yes, many probably are. Who could believe that Jesus left his family,
and walked away, and traveled to the East, and learned to be a Yogi, or Hindu Master?
What one is learning here goes against a 2000
year tradition that Jesus was actually God, and since He is God, then He can do anything, at anytime. Instead
we are learning that Jesus was a human being. Nothing more than that, and yet he was a very advanced one. Jesus
still had to study for years, just like any other human has to do if they wish to excel at their field of study. Jesus
went to India, and studied there. After many years of study he finally returned home, and he showed to all what he had
learned.
The NT is written with guile. It makes
it look like Jesus lived in Jerusalem for about 17 years, and never did a thing, he just live there, and was ordinary. Then
suddenly he performed miracles, and understood scripture. Well, only God can do that, where no prior education, and
effort was involved. Over night he is a Super Star without having applied himself. Can anyone think of one
person like that who became famous without ever applying themselves? I know I can not recall anyone.
The easiest of all trades, in my opinion,
which is singing, still the person needs to practice singing for many years. So the gospels would have us think that
Jesus suddenly was a Super Star over night. However, common sense tells us that is not so. The only other
explanation is that Jesus, like Gotama, the Buddha, left his family and went off to learn his own particular trade. Either
that, or Jesus is really God. But then the scripture shows that Jesus never acted like God before, and he only
acted like God after he was about 30 years old. Again, common sense tells us that most likely Jesus is not God, but
that instead he went off and trained for many years, and then after his studies he returned home, and showed off what he had
learned. Jesus had learned over a period of about 17 years of absence, while in India, to be a miracle worker.
Therefore the first transformation can
be seen as an earlier miracle, which involved a form of deception, which allowed Jesus to escape from his disbelieving
home town. In reality, due to how the gospels are written, where guile is involved, we can not say for certain that
this transformation in Nazareth was a miracle before the one at Cana, but we can at least give the possibility that
it happened earlier than the sign in Cana. If nothing else, at least this sign which clearly came before changing water
to wine is certain: John 1:48-50 "Nathanael said to Him, "How do You know me?'' Jesus answered and
said to him, "Before Philip called you, when you were under the fig tree, I saw you.'' Nathanael answered and said to
Him, "Rabbi, You are the Son of God! You are the King of Israel!'' Jesus answered and said to him, "Because I said to
you, `I saw you under the fig tree,' do you believe? You will see greater things than these.''
Andrew the brother of Peter already believed in Jesus before Nathanael did, due to the statements made of Jesus by
John the Baptist, who Andrew was also a disciple of, and so did many other disciples prior to the signs at Cana believe in
Jesus, and yet here after the water was changed to wine, this is said: John 2:11 "This beginning of signs Jesus did
in Cana of Galilee, and manifested His glory; and His disciples believed in Him."
We know that many of his disciples already believed in Jesus prior to the sign at Cana, but the way the verses are
written it leads the reader to think that only at Cana did the wondrous signs ever begin, which was the reason
they believed in him.
It is human nature not to believe that a miracle has happened, and other explanations are searched for, unless previously
the same person had proven before that they could perform miracles. In a real life event, if suddenly six large jars
of water became good wine, much laughter would be evoked from those who saw this take place. Jokes, and doubts
would abound denying that a real miracle had taken place, and yet in these verses they go on as if they expected nothing less
than a miracle.
Here is what happened at the miracle of Pentecost where "there appeared to them divided tongues,
as of fire, and one sat upon each of them" and where also many believers, due to the Holy Spirit,
spoke in languages they never had heard before, and yet others who knew those languages understood. The others who could
not understand the many languages spoken mocked this event. Acts 2:13-15 "Others mocking said, "They are full
of new wine.'' But Peter, standing up with the eleven, raised his voice and said to them, "Men of Judea and all who
dwell in Jerusalem, let this be known to you, and heed my words. For these are not drunk, as you suppose, since it is
only the third hour of the day."
Clearly, the miracle at Cana was not the first, for it is absurd to believe that water could be turned to
wine, and not question it unless Jesus had shown miracles previously. Obviously by the time of the
wedding feast such miracles were now common place for the disciples to witness. The servants who had
drawn the water, who likely had never seen miracles before, would be surrounded by over a dozen disciples of Jesus who would
act like this was nothing at all. Overall then the reaction would be merely one of acceptance, without ridicule, or denial,
just as portrayed in these verses.
There is no reason not to say that the miracle of His transformation happened earlier while Jesus was in the Kingdom of
Herod, at his home town of Nazareth, which is part of Galilee, then he later went on to another part of that same Kingdom,
Capernaum, also part of Galilee, and performed more miracles there, and then later while at Cana, also part of Galilee, his
first miracle there was changing water to wine.
Even though the verses in the gospel of Luke, concerning the doubt of the town people of Jesus for him to perform
miracles there, tells us that other miracles previous to his entering the synagogue in Nazareth had taken place, that does
not mean that what happened at Cana happened earlier. Jesus could have simply sat in that synagogue on the Sabbath for
weeks, and in the meantime he had done miracles elsewhere, all the while trying miracles in Nazareth, and then eventually
one Sabbath he stood up and announced who he was. We can see that most likely that is what really happened, as the
town people of Jesus had become use to his failures in Nazareth.
We should be prepared at this point to be convinced, after a little more investigation of scripture,
that Jesus performed other miracles previous to changing water to wine at Cana. Here are verses that by using logic
proves that the first of all the miracles by Jesus did not happen at Cana. John 4:54 "This again
is the second sign that Jesus did when He had come out of Judea into Galilee."
That was said to be the second miracle after the miracle at Cana of changing water to wine, which second miracle involved
a boy being healed, who was on the verge of death. In between the time of the first miracle at Cana, and the second
miracle in that same place, Jesus had while in Samaria talked to a Samaritan woman, who said this of Jesus: John
4:29 "Come, see a Man who told me all things that I ever did. Could this be the Christ?'' Then Jesus
stayed two more days in that town, and amazed nearly everyone else, and convinced most there that he was the Christ.
What Jesus did in Samaria are called signs, and wonders, which are miracles, and we have no idea how many he performed,
but an easy guess would be that the miracles were in the hundreds. So again, in Cana Jesus did two miracles,
but in between while in Samaria, he did at least one hundred.
After all, right after Jesus had convinced near an entire town in Samaria on who he was, later when in Cana
Jesus said to the man who asked for his son to be healed: John 4:48 "Then Jesus said to him, "Unless you
people see signs and wonders, you will by no means believe.'' What Jesus said to that man reflects back
upon all that Jesus had to do in Samaria.
If the first miracle Jesus ever performed was really in Cana, then the NT would not say when a child with a severe fever
was healed, while the father was in Cana, that this was the second of his miracles when obviously in Samaria many
more had been done. If the first miracle was really in Cana, then when Jesus returned to Cana, the narrative should
have said "this was his one hundred and second miracle," or however many were performed in Samaria, so that the total
in Samaria added to the first in Cana, then added to this his second while in Cana would be told. Clearly, the
NT is only talking about what happened in Cana, which does not mean it was the first where all of his miracles began.
Obviously, the NT is full of guile. In conclusion, we can be fairly certain that Cana was not the first place that
the miracles of Jesus began.
No one is certain of the location of the town called Cana in the NT. At least four different explanations on different
locations by various Bible scholars have been given, so we see deception is included even in the name of the town called Cana.
A deeper mystery on why the first so called miracle happened in a town called Cana relates to how the OT is written.
The Oral tradition, which was long ago a secret known only to the priesthood, but is public knowledge today, tells
how to find a deeper meaning in the Torah. One deeper meaning is that Cana, Genesis 9:18-26, is related to
Noah, which then ties together with what the reborn apostle Paul, and Peter are doing concerning telling who is the
person during the coming of the son of man. No deep explanation on how Cana, and Genesis 9
are related will be discussed here. Instead we continue with Jesus and His first act.
Before Jesus went to announce who he was at Nazareth, he had already become well known around Galilee, which includes
more than those sites told above. If more information were included in John 2:11, stating that no miracles
were ever displayed before in any other territory, then we would have to accept the surface reading of that verse, that this
was really the beginning of all miracles. However, as Home page proves, that verse gives one more example of the
manner in which the NT was written, proving the NT is full of guile. The authors knew the typical reader
will never look deeper, for they are no more than a babe in Christ.
Changing water to wine is also a transformation, which by calling it his first miracle at Cana, hints back at the first
miracle when Jesus saved himself. That transformation where Jesus changed his appearance obviously could not have
been the first of all of the miracles of Jesus, but it may have happened before the first miracle at Cana. At least
we do know that in his home town that it was the first miracle that involved a transformation to save himself.
We might note that the faith his town folk had in him, which was a faith of not believing in him, was
the power that assisted Jesus in his transformation to become who he was not.
The word "transformation" is the same as "Transfiguration" except by usage Transfiguration has come to be reserved
for Matthew 17:1 - 9, where the face of Jesus shown like the sun, and his clothes were bathed in radiate light, when
three of the apostles were with Him on the holy mountain, and also Moses, and Elijah appeared before them. The
Transfiguration scene outside of the gospels is only mentioned by Peter, 2 Peter 1:17-18, when Peter says just before telling
of that scene: 2 Peter 1:16 "For we did not follow cunningly devised fables when we made known
to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of His majesty."
What I was hinting at in the last verse above, when called Peter, and am explaining today is that most of the
stories in the Gospels are told so to make up myth stories, but that one scene at the transfiguration was a true
description that involved no guile. The apostle Paul mentions Noah once in his many letters, and I mention Noah twice
in my two short letters, where I also mention events during the time of Sodom, which reflects upon events today, Revelation
11:8, that tell in which city the Two Witnesses die, which is a parable about the Babes in Christ version of
Christianity, and Islam, where the parable reveals where that misunderstanding will end, which happens in the city of Washington,
DC. As regards the time they will die, it can be said that it will be very soon, either a little before 2010
AD, or a little after.
The Holy Spirit could easily tell me when the change will happen, but by my actions today the Holy Spirit is telling
us we are to mature on certain things. We are to use our own brains, and with what we find about us to
figure the solution out on our own.
So together Paul, and Peter in the NT, where Noah appears thrice, and today that relationship appears again in
this link once the deeper mysteries are explained, we therefore can be certain that the one with the most Noahs,
like in a democracy, will be the coming of the son of man. The coming of the son of man must be rejected, scripture
says so, where no trickery is involved in his rejection, unlike the so called rejection of Jesus, where we all know by even
a brief look into his life that Jesus was overall never rejected. Jesus was glorified everywhere, except
in his home town. He was glorified by the Priests who sought to kill him, for they were exceedingly jealous, and
envious of him. As for me I am like the bathroom of the house, a very necessary room to have in a home, but not
a place we honor anyone among mankind, unless they are the coming of the son of man.
Now we know that the public was also invited to a type of Transfiguration, which happened when Jesus escaped
from being thrown off a hill, only they were not aware what they were seeing, because Jesus did not explain to
them that he changed his appearance, and merely walked away. Keeping in the custom of Jesus, He only explained
his parables to his chosen disciples. However, Jesus hoped the apostles could figure out His parables on their own so He did
not need to explain.
So has Max Heindel done a similar type of deception in this area of his book, and it is done several times within
a few pages so that a clear message may be taught. The message is to investigate in greater detail, and then use logic
to figure it out.
To summarize, the first miracle in Cana of changing water to wine reflects upon the first miracle in Nazareth when Jesus
changed himself to look like another. That together with this explanation becomes the first of the acts done by the two
reborn apostles Peter, and Paul, where Paul will soon do his own type of transformation as shown further below. ))
In private He taught Rebirth to his His disciples. He not only taught them in words, but He took them "into the
mountain." This is a mystic term meaning a place of Initiation. In the course of Initiation they see for themselves that Rebirth
is a fact, for there Elijah appeared before them, who, they are told, is also John the Baptist. (( Only Peter, John, James,
and Jesus were at the Transfiguration)) Christ, in unequivocal terms, had previously told them, when speaking of John
the Baptist, "this is Elijah who was for to come." He reiterates this at the Transfiguration scene, saying, "Elijah has come
already and they knew him not, but have done to him whatsoever they listed." And following this, it is said that "they understood
He spake of John the Baptist." (Matt. 17:12-13). On this occasion, and also at the time when Rebirth was discussed between
Him and His disciples, they told Him that some thought He was Elijah and others that He was one of the prophets who had been
reborn. He commanded them to "tell no man." (Matt. 17:9; Luke 9:21). (( There is a difference here that Max does not
go into. The "tell no one" in Matt 17:9 applies to the past lives of John the Baptist, which deals with reincarnation,
where those past lives were revealed in the vision of the transfiguration, but Luke 9:21, concerns "And He strictly
warned and commanded them to tell this to no one, " which applies to the identity of Jesus Christ, which then
makes up two secrets on two different subjects. Max makes it appear to be one, and the same
because he never goes into explaining Luke 9:21, and yet, there it is, waiting to be told. )) This was to be, for
thousands of years, an esoteric teaching, to be known only among the few pioneers who fitted themselves for the knowledge,
pushing ahead to the stage of development when these truths will again be known to man. ((The transfiguration scene is
told soon after Jesus tells Peter that upon Peter will Jesus Christ build his church. Those verses where Jesus
bequeaths such an honor to Peter have a similar command by Jesus of "tell no one" found here: Matthew
16:20 "Then He commanded His disciples that they should tell no one that He was Jesus the Christ."
Just before that Jesus said this: Matthew 16:18 - 19 "And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock
I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it. And I will give you the keys of the kingdom
of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.''
So even Max, though more fit than myself, he could not loose on earth that one command of "tell no one He was the Christ." I
had been the one to seal it on earth, Acts 2:23, so that it was sealed in heaven.
The above idea had already been explained in Home page, but later in this link it will be explained again
how by using logic the statement that Jesus was crucified in Acts 2:23 is the key to prove that he was not, which all
goes back to the original command of "Tell no one." Therefore I must return to unseal it on earth, or explain it
as is being done in this web site, where this message flashes over the internet like lightning from east to west,
that it might be loosed in heaven. My use by God as the Son of Man as in the Days of Noah shows that most any person,
those not great at all, if they will be obedient to the will of God, can also be a Son of Man.
Logic tells us this is true by looking at the hard to believe fact that this simple task has been accomplished
by me, when many millions of others could have done the same, and even done a better job. Those others, who are near
an uncountable number by mere human methods of counting, not talking about what modern computers can do, have spanned
thousands of years, but were never allowed to do such a simple task, which is to announce their discovery publicly.
The Holy Spirit, or one of the Elder Brothers would tell them to keep it a secret. If they would not obey, then they
would get ill, or be punished like was the apostle Paul, when he was knocked off his horse in a blinding light, all of which
was for their own good. If they still disobeyed then they would be killed, however, not killed by God, or the angels
of God, or by the elect in heavenly places, but murdered by stupid human beings, who only feared man, or by
smart humans that were obedient more to man, than to God.
One of the main reasons, if not the only reason, that one person was allowed to lock to the masses the incorrect
idea that Jesus was crucified, and then 2000 years later the same person would unlock the correct idea that Jesus was
not crucified, all done by using simple logic, was so that rebirth could be proven to be true. This was over all,
from the view point of man, a rather complex plan, but it is very effective in being an incontrovertible proof
for reincarnation.
Excuse me for what can be called rambling ideas. As explained in another link, all text books are rambling,
only they appear not to be simply because proper introductory, and closing sentences in a paragraph have been included to
fool the reader into accepting that most published books are coherently written. I simply do not always include
those techniques to fool my readers.
I have heard a number of times so called Christians comment on how scientists, and engineers, who they admit are
brilliant people, will not accept Jesus, and his simple plan for salvation. They shake their heads thinking
the scientists are both brilliant, and fools at the same time to ignore the plan of simply believing in Jesus, and
then you are saved. The so called Christian will say "The Engineers are looking for something complicated, and because
it is simple they can not accept it as true." They usually end by saying "When they die, and come before Jesus, then
they will wish they had believed in him when they go to Hell" Then they laugh "Ha Ha Ha!" The link "Creating
Myths from guile" shows that it is the other way around, and even the Koran says the same, that: off to Hell the Christian
goes.
For many Christians, they will not be in Hell for long, nor will all of them suffer that much. It will
be Hell enough alone for most of them when they realize they have been made to be fools by their believing a
lie that a man called Jesus was God, when in fact he is not. They will learn their error, and for vain people, which
most of them are, as are many in humanity, that will be what can be called living in Hell. ))
That Christ taught Rebirth and also the law of Consequence is perhaps shown in no other place as clearly as in the case
of the man who had been born blind, where His disciples asked, "Who did sin, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?"
(John 9:2). (( Elijah is mentioned only twice in the entire RCC, once here, found near where Max tells of a
blind man, which shows that if we are not reading between the lines, then we are blind to the deeper teachings given here.
Elijah is mentioned one last time when the so called crucifixion of Jesus is told, and that is a clue that
once again a deeper teaching can be found within that area, which concerns "Tell no one." When Elijah appears in the
RCC a second time, like the second act in Cana, then the second command, the one that Max did not explain,
Luke 9:21, on "tell no one," will be covered. Max, on the surface anyway, will "tell no one," but we will find
that hidden between the lines he did say Jesus was not crucified.
Elijah, who later was John the Baptist, and earlier was Moses was to announce the coming of Christ. The law of Moses lead
the Jews on until Christ came at the time Moses became John the Baptist. By using analogy, we will see
that a pattern appears. When Peter I lead the lambs of Jesus Christ on, and today I return like did John the Baptist
to announce to Christians that Jesus was not crucified, and tell that the second coming of the light of Christ
is within you, and of course announce everything else in this web site. Here follows a link that explains in more detail
that pattern: Pattern of Evolution
Max in the RCC will also use the archangel Michael, which is only found in two places, as a method of revealing
a deeper truth, which will be publicly proven true once I appear, and logic is applied. That will be shown later in the
gold colored link below called RCC Page 336. Next we will see that Max explains, but only if we read between
the lines, that he was the apostle Paul in a past life.
Due to a number of different ideas having been explained here, which for some might result in
our losing where we are in Max's book on his chain of ideas, the last sentence we were looking at will be repeated in
order to bring us back on track: "That Christ taught Rebirth and also the law of Consequence is perhaps shown in no
other place as clearly as in the case of the man who had been born blind, where His disciples asked, "Who did sin, this man
or his parents, that he was born blind?" (John 9:2)." Then follows his next sentence. ))
Had Christ not taught Rebirth and the law of Consequence, the natural answer would have been, "Nonsense! How could a man
have sinned BEFORE HE WAS BORN, and have brought blindness upon himself as a result?" But Christ does not answer in
that way. He is not surprised at the question, nor does He treat it as being at all unusual, showing that it was quite in
harmony with His teachings. He explains, "Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents; but that the works of (the) God should
be made manifest in him."
The orthodox interpretation is that the man was born blind in order that Christ might have the
opportunity of performing a miracle to show His power. It would have been a strange way for a God to obtain glory capriciously
condemning a man to many years of blindness and misery that He might "show off" at a future time! We would consider a man
who acted in such a manner a monster of cruelty.
How much more logical to think that there may be another explanation. To impute to God conduct which, in a human being,
we would denounce in the strongest terms, is surely unreasonable.
Christ differentiates between the physically blind body of the man and the God within, which is the Higher Self.
The dense body has committed no sin. The God within has done some deed which manifests in the particular affliction from
which he is suffering. It is not stretching a point to call a man a God. ((Not Paul, but Jesus says)) Paul says, (( John 10:34,
Psalm 82:6. )) "know ye not that ye are Gods? and he (( Not "he" as in Jesus, but Paul refers )) refers to the human body
as the "temple of God," the indwelling spirit. (( Paul wrote 1 Corinthians 6:19))
Finally, although most people do not remember their past lives, there are some who do, and all may know if they will live
the life necessary to attain the knowledge. (( Max had lived the life necessary to know his past lives, and he tells you who
he was by the hint above. The God within, Max, did a deed, which manifests as an apparent error by attributing the saying
to Paul, when Max knew very well that "Know ye not that ye are Gods?" was actually said by Christ. Clairvoyance
for those that are trained, and can leave their dense bodies allows one instant access to all records, even to records few
ever knew existed. Max had editors, some of whom were trained clairvoyants. To allow such a blatant mistake to go to the publisher,
and continue today after a sixth printing, and not to be corrected shows that Paul, and Max are one, and the same. He is the
primary apostle for the gentiles, a large group, and Peter, myself, is the primary apostle for the Jews, and even for
the US Citizens, who are compared to the world not large, and both today are proving to be rebels. (America seems
a loving, and race tolerant nation, which resembles a melting pot of races. However it is America's great
wealth that creates a fictionalized love, which leads to a fictionalized melting pot. Most all US citizens no matter
their race, or previous nationality, or ethnicity are overpowered in a course to acquire material goods by
their animal propensities, so that, so long as you are among that course of action, then all are seen as near equals.
Take the money, fancy cars, and beautiful gadgets away that most all US Citizens love, and you will see that there
is not really any love toward one another any more, at least like before, and the different races then will glaringly
show that each race should not intermarry. It is not as sinister as I make it sound, only it is not as great as others
speak of the US melting pot. ) Click the followng link to see that by words, and signs
deeper meanings are hidden: RCC page 251 Max was under the instruction of the Elder Brothers, and so he was encouraged to give a hint as to his identity
using similar methods as they used. The entire writing of the RCC was under the guidance of the Elder Brothers. Excuse me
for repeating myself, saying "under the guidance of the Elder Brothers," and "use logic" time, and again. Who do you
think is guiding me besides my own intellect, and the Holy Spirit? The Brothers talk to me, although not often,
but they will, and they even joke around. Recently while I entered this insight into my site, on how Peter
is the son of man, where by reading between the lines more can be found, I heard one of them say: "Do we have to
tell you everything?"
I believe I should clarify my remark above, where I said the Brothers were being humorous, because though some will
understand my remark , others likely will not. Hopefully this will make it more clear: The
Brothers were not talking to me even once, all during the time I made my investigation into the RCC. That time covered
several weeks of intensive work sometimes consisting of ten or more hours of study a day. However, once I made
the proper investigation into the RCC by using logic, then I found many ideas were revealed where before I found none.
So after finding all of the new hidden knowledge, and then revealing it here on this website, suddenly, when I was near finished,
I heard "Do we have to tell you everything." )) This requires great strength of character, because such knowledge
will carry with it a knowledge of impending fate that may be hanging black and sinister over one, which will manifest in dire
disaster. Nature has graciously hidden the past and the future from us, that we may not be robbed of peace of mind by suffering
in anticipation of the pain in store for us. As we attain greater development we shall learn to welcome all things with equanimity,
seeing in all troubles the result of past evil and feeling thankful that the obligations incurred thereby are being annulled,
knowing that so much less stands between us and the day of liberation from the wheel of birth and death. (( I have what might
look like equanimity. Due to my trying the best I can for many years to help others in the way God wishes me to
do, and witnessing the world's resultant reaction of their not caring what so ever, now I don't care either.
I need to work on being more thankful now.))
End of quote.
--------------------------------------------------------
Next we look at the method of hiding a deeper truth, which will reveal that
Jesus was not crucified.
In order to be prepared to read what is a Cabalistic like method of hiding
a deeper truth, which is that Jesus was not crucified, first a quote from an earlier portion of the same book will
be shown. Please go to this link to see that quote, which will help to begin to reveal why Jesus was not crucified. Be believing
The following is taken from the RCC, Page 405 - 409.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the old dispensation the path of Initiation was not free and open,
except to the chosen few. The Hierophants of the Mysteries collected certain families about the Temples, setting them apart
from all the other people. These chosen families were then rigorously guarded as to certain rites and ceremonies. Their marriages
and sexual intercourse were regulated by the Hierophants.
The effect of this was to produce a race having the proper degree of
laxity between the dense and vital bodies; also to wake the desire body from its state of lethargy during sleep. Thus a special
few were made fit for Initiation and were given opportunities that could not be given to all. We see instances of this method
among the Jews, where the tribe of Levi were the chosen Templars; also in the caste of the Brahmins, who were the only priestly
class among the Hindus. ((My dense body and vital body have a great deal of laxity between them, in fact I am sometimes amazed
I can do anything at all in the physical world due to my sensitivity to spiritual energy from either human, animal, or angel. ))
The Mission of Christ, in addition to saving the lost, was to make Initiation
possible to all, therefore Jesus was not a Levite of the class to which priesthood came by inheritance. He came from the common
people and though not of the teacher class, His teaching was higher than that of Moses.(( The OT tells the story where the
Jews wished not to have a Priest rule over them, but a King, and so out of the bloodline of Jesse, 1 Samuel 16:1, was
King David chosen, who was a common shepherd, who later had a son called Solomon. This blood line continued down to Joseph
who was the father of Jesus. So we see the same relationship of Priesthood, and common people when John the Baptist came
from the priest Zechariah. In the link "Creating myths from Guile" found on the Home page, it will be proven that Jesus,
and John the baptist were Essenes, which is also known as the Dead Sea Sect at Qumran. L. H. Schiffman in his book
"Reclaiming the Dead Sea Scrolls" at page 125, said "Thus, just as the council of elders in Jerusalem, which served as the
Hasmonaean council of state, included both priestly and lay elements, so lay leaders at Qumran shared authority with
the sectarian priests." ))
Christ Jesus did not deny Moses, the law, nor the prophets. (( Which
means the Zohar must also be acknowledged. Zohar is part of the Kabbalah. Kabbalah is the oral hidden tradition of the Torah,
the hidden is today public, not secret. We recall that the Zohar said "Woe to those who only see the outer garments of the
Torah." Therefore, woe to those who miss Max's point that in the very next few sentences, where the reader has now been
warned, that there is a deeper message laying beneath the ghastly crucifixion scene. )) On the contrary, He
acknowledged them all and showed the people that they were His witnesses, as they all pointed to One Who was to come. He told
the people that those things had served their purpose and that henceforth Love must supersede Law. (( See hint RCC page 251 , also RCC page 319 & you will love this one: RCC page 336. Max will begin to tell some lies in the next sentences, and pages to follow concerning the crucifixion.
Before RCC page 405, Max never once says Jesus was crucified. That is a lot of reading, and most authors on the subject
of Christianity start on the topic of the crucifixion rather quickly, not 405 pages later. Max at the very beginning
of the RCC in the opening Poem will ask "Was Cephas, (Peter) or Paul nailed to the deathly tree?" The typical reader
will think "Ahh, yes it was Jesus nailed to a tree, or a cross." However, Max never said that, and so the guile begins where
it should, at the beginning. Here is the poem "Creed or Christ" The Poem that begins the RCC . Also, Max said above "Love must supersede Law," but those that know realize that Love contains
the whole Law. Max uses more guile to set up that which is soon to follow. By logic we see that Max just said that
we must accept all that came before, and their methods, and since Max is Paul, then he will continue in the manner of writing
like the Zohar, but first he must make his case, and then immediately here after he does what he said he would do, but how
few understood? ))
(( A look alike, or double of, )) Christ Jesus was killed.
(( Jesus miraculously transformed Simon, who carried the cross of Jesus, to look like Jesus, and then Jesus changed to look
like Simon, and he escaped. During the time of Max, and before that it was not the time then to teach the truth, not openly.
See page RCC 170, Concerning: “He commanded them to “tell no man.”” RCC page 170 & see RCC 319-320 RCC page 319, concerning: the Zohar, and secrecy. Excuse me for repeating myself, but I wish the reader to accept that
Max is telling here what can be called an allegory, and that he warned the reader what he would do. )) In connection
with this fact, we come to the supreme and fundamental difference between Him and the previous teachers, in whom the Race
spirits were born. They all died and must be reborn again and again to help their peoples bear their destiny. The Archangel
Michael (the Race-spirit of the Jews) (( The same angel that visited me)) raised up Moses, who was taken up to Mount Nebo
to die. He was reborn as Elijah. Elijah returned as John the Baptist; Buddha died and was reborn as Shankaracharya; Shri Krishna
says, "Whenever there is decay of Dharma. . .and. . .exaltation of Adharma, then I myself come forth for the protection of
the good, for the destruction of evil-doers, for the sake of firmly establishing Dharma. I am born from age to age." (( As
impossible as it may seem, I too, the reborn apostle Peter am reborn in this age for the destruction of evil doers,
for the sake of firmly establishing Dharma for the Jews. I am a sign, like a signet ring on the hand of God, which
shows God is behind this act. It is not merely of man. The chosen race, the Jews, is symbolic, and makes
up an allegory in the OT. All of humanity is the chosen race, and so is Jerusalem, or "the promised land" symbolic for the
entire earth, not just one little spot in the Middle East. Those grand ideas, actual facts, will be learned by reading
the works of the RF, and the TS. ))
When death came Moses' face SHONE and Buddha's body become ALIGHT. They all
reached the stage when the spirit begins to shine from within--but then they died.
Christ Jesus reached that stage on the Mount of Transfiguration. ((
Peter, myself, speaks of this event in 2 Peter 1:15 - 18. First I say I will remind you of these things after my departure,
and here I am to remind you. This entire area in the RCC, talking about the Zohar, and now talking about the Mount of Transfiguration
relates to the Elder Brothers knowing of my rebirth, soon to happen about 40 years later, and guiding Max to write the RCC
in this manner. )) It is of the very highest significance that HIS REAL WORK TOOK PLACE SUBSEQUENT TO THAT EVENT. He suffered;
was KILLED--and RESURRECTED. (( Elevated meaning like in the Torah. See the Theosophical Society (TS) limits on miracles . Jesus was not killed, but raised up, his spirit taken up, and his vital body left behind,
along with his entire physical body, buried in a crypt, in a subterranean passage around the Dead Sea area. This body is used
annually by the Christ spirit to enter earth, around Xmas time, and return again to the Sun around Easter. ))
Being killed is a very different thing from dying. The blood that had been
the vehicle of the Race-spirit must FLOW and be cleansed of that contaminating influence. Love of father and mother, exclusive
of other fathers and mothers, must go--otherwise Universal Brotherhood and an all-embracing Altruistic Love could never become
an actuality.
THE CLEANSING BLOOD.
When the Savior Christ Jesus (( His look alike, who would later be born as
Mohammed the prophet)) was crucified His body was pierced in five places; in the five centers where the currents of the vital
body flow; and the pressure of the crown of thorns caused a flow from the sixth also. (This is a hint to those who already
know these currents. A full elucidation of this matter cannot be publicly given out at this time.)
When the blood flowed from these centers, the great Sun-spirit Christ was
liberated from the physical vehicle of Jesus and found Himself IN THE EARTH, with individual vehicles. The already existing
planetary vehicles He permeated with His own vehicles and, in the twinkling of an eye, diffused His own desire body over the
planet, which has enabled Him thenceforth to work upon the Earth and its humanity from WITHIN.
At that moment a tremendous wave of spiritual sunlight flooded the Earth.
It rent the veil which the Race-spirit had hung before the Temple to keep out all but the chosen few, and it made the Path
of Initiation free thence-forth to whomsoever will. So far as concerned the Spiritual Worlds, this wave transformed the conditions
of the Earth like a flash of lightning, but the dense, concrete conditions are, of course, much more slowly affected.
Like all rapid and high vibrations of light, this great wave blinded the people
by its dazzling brilliance, therefore it was said that "the Sun was darkened." The very opposite was what actually occurred.
The Sun was not darkened, but shone out in glorious splendor. It was the excess of light that blinded the people, and only
as the entire Earth absorbed the desire body of the bright Sun-spirit did the vibration return to a more normal rate. (( Max
tells another lie here on light. Noon to 3 PM. Matthew 27:45; Luke 23:44. Eyes adjust if it is bright. Three hours to adjust?
So this lie is a hint for the reader to get more light, seek the truth. Therefore we can be sure that we must accept the Zohar,
and that the time to reveal the plain truth about the crucifixion could not be given during the time of Max so “that
a person who ran, could also read.” ))
The expression, "the cleansing blood of Christ Jesus," ((1 John 1:7)) means
that as the blood flowed on Calvary, it bore with it the great Sun-spirit Christ, Who by that means secured admission to the
earth itself and since that moment has been its Regent. He diffused His own desire body throughout the planet, thereby cleansing
it from all the vile influences which had grown up under the REGIME of the Race-spirit. (( Jesus was chained to a post, Greek
“xulon,” and whipped, not put on a cross, Greek “stauro.” Hebrews 9:22-23 and 1 Peter 2:24. Blood
from stripes heal, when he was whipped, not the blood from a crucifixion. Simon of Cyrene, who was changed by Jesus to look
like Jesus, was crucified, and later was reborn as Mohammed the prophet. Simon was killed to close the Old Testament, as Simon
in a far previous life had been Ishmael, the first son of Abraham. So this great soul began, and he ended the old Covenant,
which had to be sealed by his death. When the book of Hebrews is read using these facts, then a deeper understanding will
be found. That deeper understanding will be covered in another link, when I get to it. ))
Under the law all sinned; nay, more--they could not help it. They had not
evolved to where they could do right for Love's sake. The desire nature was so strong that it was an impossibility for them
to rule it altogether, therefore their debts, engendered under the law of Consequence, piled up to monstrous proportions.
Evolution would have been terribly delayed and many lost to our life wave altogether it some help had not been given.
Therefore did Christ come "to seek and to save that which was lost." He took
away the sin of the world by His cleansing blood, (( Blood by the whipping, not a crucifixion.)) which gave Him entrance to
the Earth and its humanity. He purified the conditions and we owe it to Him that we are able to gather for our desire bodies
purer desire-stuff than formerly, and He continues working to help us, by making our external environment constantly purer.
That this was and is done at the expense of great suffering to Himself, no
one can doubt who is able to form the least conception of the limitations endured by that Great Spirit in entering the hampering
conditions of physical existence, even in the best and purest vehicle possible; nor is His present limitation as Regent of
the Earth must less painful. True, He is also Regent of the Sun, and therefore only partially confined to the Earth, yet the
limitations set by the crampingly slow vibrations of our dense planet must be almost endurable.
Had Christ Jesus simply died, it would have been impossible for Him
to have done this work, but the Christians have a RISEN Savior; One Who is ever present to help those who call upon His Name.
(( Max had to leave the old teaching alone, until I arrived, so he really preaches a great story here, all of which is a lie.))
This Having suffered like unto ourselves in all things and knowing fully our needs, He is lenient toward our mistakes and
failures so long as we continue trying to live the good life. We must ever keep before our eyes the fact that THE ONLY REAL
FAILURE IS CEASING TO TRY. (( The vicarious atonement from the blood of Jesus is what Max is hinting at, which is still a
lie. )) Upon the death of the dense body of Christ Jesus, (( see RCC page 440 and RCC pages 102 & 103. Vital body decays with dense body. Therefore Jesus never died. The
physical body is still alive, for if not, then the vital body would disintegrate, and Christ would be trapped in the
earth. Logic, all done by simple logic, and the lie is shown to be very obvious. Neither Max, nor the reborn Peter
are as insane as they appear. The reader if they have not read the entire RCC will have to do so, in order to see how plain
is this lie. )) the seed atom was returned to the original owner, Jesus of Nazareth, who for some time afterward, while functioning
in a vital body which he had gathered temporarily, taught the nucleus of the new faith which Christ had left behind. Jesus
of Nazareth has since had the guidance of the esoteric branches which sprang up all over Europe. ((When one has been initiated
into the 9th degree as had Jesus, then he has completely transmuted all their soul body into spirit, and they no
longer need a vital body. They are able to operate invisibly even to clairvoyant sight. Still they can interact
with common humans, knocking them off horses in a blinding light, such as happened to Paul, or two thousand years later beating
up innocent people who don't recall they were a past apostle of Jesus. I still have not figured out why his rough
stuff was used on such a nice guy?)) end quote.
Here is a link to a recent addition that proves more on Max misleading the typical reader: There have to be clowns
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Enter supporting content here
*
Man tries to send flowers to Fort Hood shooter, calls him a "hero"
U.S. Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan is accused of killing 13 people and wounding 29 more at Fort Hood military base last week.
Dan M. Ross, 61. of Lehigh Acres, was just trying to follow the New Testament and love his enemies.
So Ross sent an e-mail to Marvel’s Florist in Killeen, Texas, ordering a $59.95 yellow rose bouquet for Hasan.
He ordered a note be included with the flowers reading: “Major Nidal Hasan. Koran 2: 190 - 3. In God’s eye,
and those who submit, you are a hero!”
Guess that got your attention -- and the FBI's.
Ross instructing the flower shop employees to “play stupid” if anyone were to question them.
The owner of the flower shop found the email "disturbing" and hand delivered it to the FBI.
Ross, who claims to be “the reincarnated Apostle Peter” and “the coming son of man,” said he doesn’t
condone the Fort Hood shootings. He believes Hasan has a limited understanding of the Scriptures of God.
“God would take that into consideration and say ‘You did the best you can with what you knew,’”
Ross said, reports the Naples Daily News.
The FBI came to his door.
Ross emailed the flower shop directed them to his Web site, www.donutnous.com, and said they did not respect his “US
Constitutional rights.” Ross told them after reading it if they look in the mirror, they will know who the enemy is:
“It is yourself.”
Photo: Still image provided by NBC-2 Lehigh Acres resident Dan M. Ross is interviewed by an NBC-2 reporter in this still
image provided by the TV station.
Update from FloriDUH headquarters: Because the Spam bot is such a pest, it's taking longer for your comments to
post. Hang with us. It'll happen.
More FloriDUH
POSTED IN: West Coast of Florida (261) , you decide (276)
> Discuss this entry
*
|
|
|
 |
Comments
Nut cases transcend all racial and religious boundaries I guess.
Posted by: Jojo | November 11, 2009 7:57 AM
Ignorant SOB and religious pshchotic. send him over to the sandsox to be a "Missionary". They have all kinds of respect for your "U.S. Constitutional Rights"
Posted by: SIXFOOTERsez | November 11, 2009 7:58 AM
Mr. Ross you should be so proud of yourself for being such an idiot. Where do these people come from?????
Posted by: KF | November 11, 2009 8:22 AM
Must be the Florida school system...
Posted by: David | November 11, 2009 8:30 AM
Maybe its time the IRS scrutize this idiots tax records for the last 20-30 years. Sounds like he doesn't like our military probably was kicked out.
Posted by: Bobby B | November 11, 2009 9:19 AM
Common loons migrate south in the winter. I guess this guy never left. Wow.
Posted by: Square Grouper | November 11, 2009 9:54 AM
Send him to live with these types in the Middle East if he is so sympathetic to them. . Im sure they would welcome his head in their open arms ..
Posted by: junglejim123 | November 11, 2009 10:27 AM
this guy should be horse whipped!
Posted by: freddy | November 11, 2009 10:28 AM
God only has one eye? We've been worshiping a big cyclops
Posted by: its me | November 11, 2009 10:48 AM
With a head shaped like an eggplant, what do you expect?
Posted by: TBone | November 11, 2009 11:21 AM
They should take this fruitcake and send him to Iraq...He's a disgrace to this country...
Posted by: You sir are a TRAITOR! | November 11, 2009 11:52 AM
Where do these people come from?????
america,
happy vetenarians day .....
cukoo
Posted by: cukooamericano | November 11, 2009 1:49 PM
Well it's obvious that this guy is crazy. Let's not blame it on anything but that. I'm sure there are some more loons out there just like him. So don't get so bent out of shape on what he said or whether or not he's religious. The guy has lost his marbles. He lives in a retirement community so what can you expect?
Posted by: Kevin | November 11, 2009 11:38 PM
Dr. Hasan would have been thrilled to have a re-incarnated St. Peter as his admirer. Although I am not sure what Muslims think about St. Peter. They consider Jesus a minor prophet but what about the saints?
We will never know, the roses were apparently not dlivered. Dr. Hasan is, of course, not crazy at all although he may use insanity as his defense. He will certainly know how to present plenty of psychotic signs...
The head of this guy is truly remarkable, as other write here, one should expect something special from folks with head like that...
Posted by: Ladislav Nemec | November 12, 2009 3:40 AM
He looks like a reject from the Outer Limits.
Posted by: Bill014U2 | November 12, 2009 7:51 AM
Nutcases also seem to come together and egg each other on which is a very bad thing as it glamorizes and promotes these ridiculous events, the less publicity the better I think in this case.
Posted by: Timothy @ Florist supplies | November 16, 2009 10:32 PM
I am Dan Ross, the same in this news article. Ever since in 1996 I proved the Government is segregating the news, such as when Mitsubishi Motors, with 300 women abused, and then Texaco with eight blacks, the IRS has audited my tax records every year. They broke the law, I did not. Such reports should have come every year, it happens all the time but only when I sued the EEOC did it come out, and the news made a cover-up story. By many miracles, not just that stated here, I prove to be the reborn apostle Peter: Qur'an 5:33.
Posted by: Dan Ross | April 21, 2010 7:17